Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Does really no one care? Analyzing the public engagement of communication scientists on Twitter

16 references·16 citing·43 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2007The Honest Broker2,019 cited
1973Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities.1,150 cited
1990The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses741 cited
2017Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature572 cited
2010Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web375 cited
2018Potential Biases in Big Data: Omitted Voices on Social Media329 cited
2016Scientists’ Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement328 cited
2016Science Communication302 cited
2017Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics291 cited
2016How Are Scientists Using Social Media in the Workplace?282 cited
1983Sprechakte: Ein sprachphilosophischer Essay275 cited
2016Automating power: Social bot interference in global politics259 cited
2011The mobilization of scientists for public engagement199 cited
2018Scientists on Twitter: Preaching to the choir or singing from the rooftops?191 cited
2017A systematic identification and analysis of scientists on Twitter174 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2003

Experts in the Mass Media: Researchers as Sources in Danish Daily Newspapers, 1961–2001

128 cited

Cited by

2020Using interpersonal communication strategies to encourage science conversations on social media92 cited
2020Communicating science in organizational contexts: toward an “organizational turn” in science communication research60 cited
2023Exploring ‘quality’ in science communication online: Expert thoughts on how to assess and promote science communication quality in digital media contexts35 cited
2022How epidemiologists exploit the emerging genres of twitter for public engagement34 cited
2022Dissemination or participation? Exploring scientists’ definitions and science communication goals in the Netherlands33 cited
2021Conceptualizing science communication in flux — a framework for analyzing science communication in a digital media environment25 cited
2024The Vibes Are Off: Did Elon Musk Push Academics Off Twitter?20 cited
2023Science communication on Twitter: Measuring indicators of engagement and their links to user interaction in communication scholars’ Tweet content17 cited
2020Wissenschaftskommunikation zwischen Gesellschafts‑, Wissenschafts- und Medienwandel17 cited
2022An HCI Research Agenda for Online Science Communication16 cited
2022The new stage of public engagement with science in the digital media environment: citizen science communicators in the discussion of GMOs on Zhihu15 cited
2022Comparison of public discussions of gene editing on social media between the United States and China15 cited
2023Evaluationsmethoden der Wissenschaftskommunikation12 cited
2022Academics’ Attitudes Toward Engaging in Public Discussions: Experimental Evidence on the Impact of Engagement Conditions10 cited
2020Einflussfaktoren bei der Social-Media-Nutzung in der Wissenschaftskommunikation10 cited
2022Whose research benefits more from Twitter? On Twitter-worthiness of communication research and its role in reinforcing disparities of the field10 cited