Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Unambivalent alignment: Japan’s China strategy, the US alliance, and the ‘hedging’ fallacy

14 references·1 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1995Rationalist explanations for war4,047 cited
1984The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics1,027 cited
2008Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing Regional Security Strategies526 cited
2008The Essence of Hedging: Malaysia and Singapore´ s Response to a Rising China469 cited
2005Strategic hedging and the future of Asia‐pacific stability286 cited
2015Reassessing Hedging: The Logic of Alignment in East Asia276 cited
2011Business as Usual? Economic Responses to Political Tensions209 cited
2015Between the Eagle and the Dragon: America, China, and Middle State Strategies in East Asia144 cited
20193.11101 cited
20133.11: Disaster and Change in Japan95 cited
2010The Limits of Alignment: Southeast Asia and the Great Powers since 197580 cited
2014The rise of the Chinese ‘Other’ in Japan's construction of identity: Is China a focal point of Japanese nationalism?72 cited
2015Examining Japan's Lost Decades47 cited
2019China’s Maritime Gray Zone Operations45 cited

Cited by

2020The free and open Indo-Pacific versus the belt and road: spheres of influence and Sino-Japanese relations

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

54 cited