this work references cited by second hopReferences
- 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
- 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
- 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
- 2011Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials7,681 cited
- 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
- 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
- 2019The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis4,525 cited
- 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
- 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
- 2002How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?3,021 cited
- 2011GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)2,798 cited
- 2010Robust variance estimation in meta‐regression with dependent effect size estimates2,081 cited
- 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
- 1987QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE11,637 cited
Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work