SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Descriptive Analysis of Clinical Articles Published in the Last 50 Years in the Dental Literature
12 references·1 citing·50 second hopsampled
A Descriptive Analysis of Clinical Articles Published in the Last 50 Years in the Dental Literature (2019)A Descriptive Analysis of Clinical Articl…Evidence‐based dentistry or meta‐analysis illness? A commentary on current publishing trends in the field of temporomandibular disorders and bruxism (2018)Evidence‐based dentistry or m…A Quality Analysis of Systematic Reviews in Dentistry, Part 1: Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (2017)A Quality Analysis of Systema…Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare (2013)Systematic reviews and meta-a…How to write a scientific manuscript for publication. (2013)How to write a scientific man…Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making (2010)Evidence-based practice: how …What Is the Methodologic Quality of Human Therapy Studies in ISI Surgical Publications? (2006)What Is the Methodologic Qual…The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency (2006)The relationship between qual…Randomization in surgical trials (2002)Randomization in surgical tri…Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions (2002)Hierarchy of evidence: a fram…Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough (1998)Summing up evidence: one answ…Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)Meta-analysis: Principles and…Methodologic standards in surgical trials (1996)Methodologic standards in sur…Recent trends in dental research in Saudi Arabia: Mapping review (2010–2020) (2022)Recent trends in dental resea…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Reporting and interpretation of SF-36 outcomes in randomised trials: systematic review (2009)Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature (2016)Standardised regression coefficient as an effect size index in summarising findings in epidemiological studies (2022)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Critical appraisal of the orthopaedic literature: Therapeutic and economic analysis (2006)In a review of stroke rehabilitation studies, concealed allocation was under reported (2008)The Quality of Randomized Controlled Trial Reporting in Spine Literature (2011)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Integrated STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Instructional Practices in Secondary Education (2018)Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation (2020)Impulse buying: A systematic literature review and future research directions (2022)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)Methods and Processes of the CONSORT Group: Example of an Extension for Trials Assessing Nonpharmacologic Treatments (2008)Checklist for Reporting Results Using Observational Descriptive Studies as Research Designs: The MInCir Initiative (2017)A unified framework for bias assessment in clinical research (2019)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews of the Relationship Between Periodontal and Systemic Diseases (2019)Tutorial for performing systematic review and meta-analysis with interventional anesthesia studies (2019)Tutorial para execução de revisões sistemáticas e metanálises com estudos de intervenção em anestesia (2019)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade (2006)Mortality Rates in Patients With Anorexia Nervosa and Other Eating Disorders (2011)The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy (1990)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Estudos de revisão sistemática: um guia para síntese criteriosa da evidência científica (2007)11 Evidence in Management and Organizational Science: Assembling the Field’s Full Weight of Scientific Knowledge Through Syntheses (2008)Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies (2016)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. (2014)Writing narrative style literature reviews (2015)The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Discussion (2019)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1997Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures2,414 cited
  • 2002Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions993 cited
  • 2013Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare757 cited
  • 1998Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough655 cited
  • 2006The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency185 cited
  • 1996Methodologic standards in surgical trials84 cited
  • 2013How to write a scientific manuscript for publication.70 cited
  • 2006What Is the Methodologic Quality of Human Therapy Studies in ISI Surgical Publications?57 cited
  • 2010Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making40 cited
  • 2002Randomization in surgical trials21 cited
  • 2017A Quality Analysis of Systematic Reviews in Dentistry, Part 1: Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials20 cited
  • 2018Evidence‐based dentistry or meta‐analysis illness? A commentary on current publishing trends in the field of temporomandibular disorders and bruxism19 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Recent trends in dental research in Saudi Arabia: Mapping review (2010–2020)6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work