SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Why Trust Science
0 references·10 citing·43 second hop
Why Trust Science (2019)Why Trust ScienceWho Speaks for Science? (2021)Who Speaks for Science?Values and Persons: The Persistent Problem of Values in Science and Psychology (2021)Values and Persons: The Persi…Prosociality in science (2021)Prosociality in scienceHow we Think About Human Nature: Cognitive Errors and Concrete Remedies (2021)How we Think About Human Natu…Digital humanities, knowledge complexity, and the five ‘aporias’ of digital research (2021)Digital humanities, knowledge…COVID-19 heralds a new epistemology of science for the public good (2021)COVID-19 heralds a new episte…Beyond politics: additional factors underlying skepticism of a COVID-19 vaccine (2021)Beyond politics: additional f…Sealing the gateways for post-truthism: Reestablishing the epistemic authority of science (2020)Sealing the gateways for post…Innovation in a crisis: rethinking conferences and scholarship in a pandemic and climate emergency (2020)Innovation in a crisis: rethi…Disagreeing about how to know: The instructional value of explorations into knowing (2020)Disagreeing about how to know…Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions (2000)Epistemic Injustice (2007)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Dealing with disagreement: The roles of topic familiarity and disagreement explanation in evaluation of conflicting expert claims and sources (2020)“Fake News” or Real Science? Critical Thinking to Assess Information on COVID-19 (2021)Spread of misinformation on social media: What contributes to it and how to combat it (2022)Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1970)Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1976)Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming (2011)Critical integrative argumentation: Toward complexity in students’ thinking (2020)Developing deep learning in science classrooms: Tactics to manage epistemic uncertainty during whole‐class discussion (2021)An anchor in troubled times: Trust in science before and within the COVID-19 pandemic (2022)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)8 Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples (2024)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Science, policy, and the value-free ideal (2009)Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal (2009)How the case against the MMR vaccine was fixed (2011)Attitudes of health care professionals towards COVID-19 vaccine - a sequence from Turkey (2021)COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and patient self-advocacy: a statistical analysis of those who can and can’t get vaccinated (2022)Vaccine Hesitancy and the Concept of Trust: An Analysis Based on the Israeli COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign (2023)Investigative pathways: patterns and stages in the careers of experimental scientists (2004)The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader (2011)Why Trust Science? (2019)‘Medical Corona Science’: Philosophical and systemic issues: Re‐thinking medicine? On the epistemology of Corona medicine (2022)Computing and Modeling After COVID-19: More Responsible, Less Technical (2022)Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 (1989)What Computers Still Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason (1994)Data Feminism (2020)Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust (1998)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Promoting Civility in Formal And Informal Open Science Contexts (2023)Theory and Model Building in Psychology: Mapping the Current Debate (2026)How we think. (1910)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. (1964)Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States (2013)The spread of true and false news online (2018)Ten competencies for the science misinformation crisis (2022)Conceptual Errors (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2020Sealing the gateways for post-truthism: Reestablishing the epistemic authority of science90 cited
  • 2020Disagreeing about how to know: The instructional value of explorations into knowing76 cited
  • 2021Who Speaks for Science?68 cited
  • 2021Digital humanities, knowledge complexity, and the five ‘aporias’ of digital research32 cited
  • 2021COVID-19 heralds a new epistemology of science for the public good18 cited
  • 2021Beyond politics: additional factors underlying skepticism of a COVID-19 vaccine18 cited
  • 2020Innovation in a crisis: rethinking conferences and scholarship in a pandemic and climate emergency8 cited
  • 2021Prosociality in science7 cited
  • 2021How we Think About Human Nature: Cognitive Errors and Concrete Remedies5 cited
  • 2021Values and Persons: The Persistent Problem of Values in Science and Psychology0 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work