Citation map · Study

Reporting sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials published in nursing journals: A cross-sectional study

15 references·0 citing·35 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

1992A power primer.42,571 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
2007Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies10,709 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
2013SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials7,356 cited
2017Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study56 cited
2015CONSORT Item Reporting Quality in the Top Ten Ranked Journals of Critical Care Medicine in 2011: A Retrospective Analysis41 cited
2014Endorsement of the CONSORT guidelines, trial registration, and the quality of reporting randomised controlled trials in leading nursing journals: A cross-sectional analysis34 cited
2018Sample size calculations are poorly conducted and reported in many randomized trials of hip and knee osteoarthritis: results of a systematic review33 cited
2015Methodological Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in 3 Leading Diabetes Journals From 2011 to 2013 Following CONSORT Statement26 cited
2016Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts published in leading laser medicine journals: an assessment using the CONSORT for abstracts guidelines

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.