SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
On Conveying the Probative Value of DNA Evidence: Frequencies, Likelihood Ratios, and Error Rates
0 references·5 citing·25 second hop
On Conveying the Probative Value of DNA Evidence: Frequencies, Likelihood Ratios, and Error Rates (1996)On Conveying the Probative Value of DNA E…The scientific reinvention of forensic science (2023)The scientific reinvention of…Error Rates, Likelihood Ratios, and Jury Evaluation of Forensic Evidence (2020)Error Rates, Likelihood Ratio…If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony (2011)If the Shoe Fits They Might A…The Influence of Identification Decision and DNA Evidence on Juror Decision Making1 (2009)The Influence of Identificati…Probabilistic reasoning in the law (1998)Probabilistic reasoning in th…Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Judgment under Uncertainty (1982)How Jurors Evaluate Fingerprint Evidence: The Relative Importance of Match Language, Method Information, and Error Acknowledgment (2013)The psychology of interpreting expert evaluative opinions (2013)The impact of proficiency testing information and error aversions on the weight given to fingerprint evidence (2019)Naked statistical evidence of liability: Is subjective probability enough? (1992)Juror reactions to DNA evidence: Errors and expectancies. (1999)When are people persuaded by DNA match statistics? (2001)Jurors’ Perceptions of Evidence: The Relative Influence of DNA and Eyewitness Testimony when Presented by Opposing Parties (2016)Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability (1973)Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. (1983)Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. (1984)Probabilistic reasoning in the law (1998)Interpretation of Evidence, and Sample Size Determination (2000)Understanding forensic science opinions (2015)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Jury Decision Making: Implications For and From Psychology (2011)Juror appraisals of forensic evidence: Effects of blind proficiency and cross-examination (2020)Implementation of algorithms in pattern & impression evidence: A responsible and practical roadmap (2021)A transparent approach: Openness in forensic science reporting (2024)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)From understanding to justifying: Computational reliabilism for AI-based forensic evidence evaluation (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2011If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony39 cited
  • 2023The scientific reinvention of forensic science35 cited
  • 1998Probabilistic reasoning in the law34 cited
  • 2020Error Rates, Likelihood Ratios, and Jury Evaluation of Forensic Evidence24 cited
  • 2009The Influence of Identification Decision and DNA Evidence on Juror Decision Making115 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work