SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
F1000Prime recommended articles and their citations: an exploratory study of four journals
16 references·0 citing·52 second hop
F1000Prime recommended articles and their citations: an exploratory study of four journals (2019)F1000Prime recommended articles and their…Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data (2018)Do altmetrics correlate with …Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts? (2015)Methods for the generation of…Keeping up to date: An academic researcher's information journey (2015)Keeping up to date: An academ…Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Growth rates of modern scienc…Does quality and content matter for citedness? A comparison with para-textual factors and over time (2015)Does quality and content matt…Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100) (2013)Which percentile-based approa…The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000 (2013)The validation of (advanced) …F 1000 Recommendations as a Potential New Data Source for Research Evaluation: A Comparison With Citations (2013)F 1000 Recommendations as a P…Assessing non-standard article impact using F1000 labels (2013)Assessing non-standard articl…High Impact = High Statistical Standards? Not Necessarily So (2012)High Impact = High Statistica…Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation (2012)Citation time window choice f…Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement (2011)Validating online reference m…Looking for Landmarks: The Role of Expert Review and Bibliometric Analysis in Evaluating Scientific Publication Outputs (2009)Looking for Landmarks: The Ro…The ups and downs of peer review (2007)The ups and downs of peer rev…A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study II. Decisions at the reading and citing stages (1999)A cognitive model of document…Science Since Babylon (1961)Science Since BabylonNetworks of Scientific Papers (1965)Scientific peer review (2011)The natural selection of bad science (2016)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)The scientific impact of nations (2004)Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics (2009)Creativity in scientific teams: Unpacking novelty and impact (2014)Scientometrics in a changing research landscape (2014)Defining and identifying Sleeping Beauties in science (2015)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Fast growing research on negative emissions (2017)Field Normalization of Scientometric Indicators (2019)Global Research Trends in Consumer Behavior and Sustainability in E-Commerce: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Knowledge Structure (2022)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Measuring the Value of Research Data: A Citation Analysis of Oceanographic Data Sets (2014)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: A study using data from Altmetric and F1000Prime (2014)M endeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fields (2015)When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? S copus versus M endeley for LIS journals (2015)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Bibliometrics to webometrics (2008)Evaluating altmetrics (2013)Scholarly Impact: A Pluralist Conceptualization (2014)Grand challenges in altmetrics: heterogeneity, data quality and dependencies (2016)The New Encyclopaedia Britannica (1991)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication (2012)How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications (2014)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The Conceptual Framework of Psychology (1954)Process descriptions of decision making (1979)Authors as citers over time (2001)Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (2002)Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework (2007)Core elements in the process of citing publications: Conceptual overview of the literature (2018)Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. (2004)Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective (2014)The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)Differences and similarities between Journal Impact Factor and CiteScore (2018)Overton: A bibliometric database of policy document citations (2022)Social media usage to share information in communication journals: An analysis of social media activity and article citations (2022)From the science of science to Scientometrics visualizing the history of science with HistCite software (2009)The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references1,570 cited
  • 1961Science Since Babylon444 cited
  • 2012Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation416 cited
  • 2007The ups and downs of peer review296 cited
  • 2011Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement255 cited
  • 2009Looking for Landmarks: The Role of Expert Review and Bibliometric Analysis in Evaluating Scientific Publication Outputs168 cited
  • 2018Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data142 cited
  • 2015Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts?136 cited
  • 2013F 1000 Recommendations as a Potential New Data Source for Research Evaluation: A Comparison With Citations131 cited
  • 1999A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study II. Decisions at the reading and citing stages126 cited
  • 2013The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000118 cited
  • 2012High Impact = High Statistical Standards? Not Necessarily So79 cited
  • 2015Keeping up to date: An academic researcher's information journey65 cited
  • 2013

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Assessing non-standard article impact using F1000 labels
64 cited
  • 2015Does quality and content matter for citedness? A comparison with para-textual factors and over time56 cited
  • 2013Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100)54 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.