SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Predatory publishing, hijacking of legitimate journals and impersonation of researchers via special issue announcements: a warning for editors and authors about a new scam
12 references·1 citing·38 second hop
Predatory publishing, hijacking of legitimate journals and impersonation of researchers via special issue announcements: a warning for editors and authors about a new scam (2019)Predatory publishing, hijacking of legiti…How to respond to and what to do for papers published in predatory journals? (2018)How to respond to and what to…What I learned from predatory publishers (2017)What I learned from predatory…Predatory Journals Spamming for Publications: What Should Researchers Do? (2017)Predatory Journals Spamming f…Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” lists must not be used: they are biased, flawed, opaque and inaccurate (2017)Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” l…Beware of the predatory science journal: A potential threat to the integrity of medical research (2017)Beware of the predatory scien…Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers (2017)Are predatory journals underm…Hijacked Journals: An Emerging Challenge for Scholarly Publishing (2016)Hijacked Journals: An Emergin…Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics (2016)Hijacked journals, hijacked w…Free editors and peers: squeezing the lemon dry (2016)Free editors and peers: squee…Ban predators from the scientific record (2016)Ban predators from the scient…Beyond Beall’s List: Better understanding predatory publishers (2015)Beyond Beall’s List: Better u…Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…Challenges for the Academic Editor in the Scientific Publication (2020)Challenges for the Academic E…Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? (2018)Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis (2019)Exploring PubMed as a reliable resource for scholarly communications services (2019)Medical Publishing Triage - Chronicling Predatory Open Access Publishers (2013)Hijacked Journals and Predatory Publishers: Is There a Need to Re-Think How to Assess the Quality of Academic Research? (2014)The full story of 90 hijacked journals from August 2011 to June 2015 (2015)Predatory Journals on Trial: Allegations, Responses, and Lessons for Scholarly Publishing from FTC v. OMICS (2019)Detecting a network of hijacked journals by its archive (2021)Challenges posed by hijacked journals in Scopus (2023)Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review (2014)Publishing: The peer-review scam (2014)Academic E-Mail Overload and the Burden of “Academic Spam” (2020)The history of the peer-review process (2002)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric (2016)Should Authors be Requested to Suggest Peer Reviewers? (2017)The Clarivate TM Analytics acquisition of Publons – an evolution or commodification of peer review? (2017)Do Legitimate Publishers Benefit or Profit from Error, Misconduct or Fraud? (2021)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Publishing in predatory tourism and hospitality journals: Mapping the academic market and identifying response strategies (2018)An Education Session Developed in Response to Low Health Professional Awareness of Predatory Journals (2019)Distance education as a tool to improve researchers’ knowledge on predatory journals in countries with limited resources: the Moroccan experience (2023)Firm action needed on predatory journals (2015)Revisiting the Term Predatory Open Access Publishing (2019)Why do researchers decide to publish in questionable journals? A review of the literature (2019)Two decades of game concepts in digital learning environments – A bibliometric study and research agenda (2021)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Is Predatory Publishing a Real Threat? Evidence from a Large Database Study (2017)Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)How Frequently Are Articles in Predatory Open Access Journals Cited (2020)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology (2017)What Value Do Journal Whitelists and Blacklists Have in Academia? (2018)Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them (2020)Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 2017What I learned from predatory publishers306 cited
  • 2015Beyond Beall’s List: Better understanding predatory publishers163 cited
  • 2016Ban predators from the scientific record126 cited
  • 2017Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers119 cited
  • 2017Predatory Journals Spamming for Publications: What Should Researchers Do?93 cited
  • 2016Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics77 cited
  • 2016Hijacked Journals: An Emerging Challenge for Scholarly Publishing45 cited
  • 2017Beware of the predatory science journal: A potential threat to the integrity of medical research33 cited
  • 2016Free editors and peers: squeezing the lemon dry26 cited
  • 2017Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” lists must not be used: they are biased, flawed, opaque and inaccurate25 cited
  • 2018How to respond to and what to do for papers published in predatory journals?21 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Challenges for the Academic Editor in the Scientific Publication9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work