SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The SSSPIN study—spin in studies of spin: meta-research analysis
8 references·7 citing·49 second hop
The SSSPIN study—spin in studies of spin: meta-research analysis (2019)The SSSPIN study—spin in studies of spin:…Level and Prevalence of Spin in Published Cardiovascular Randomized Clinical Trial Reports With Statistically Nonsignificant Primary Outcomes (2019)Level and Prevalence of Spin …Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in oncology: a systematic review (2018)Overinterpretation and misrep…Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of otolaryngology randomized controlled trials (2018)Evaluation of spin in the abs…‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review (2017)‘Spin’ in published biomedica…Observational studies often make clinical practice recommendations: an empirical evaluation of authors' attitudes (2013)Observational studies often m…Belief beyond the evidence: using the proposed effect of breakfast on obesity to show 2 practices that distort scientific evidence (2013)Belief beyond the evidence: u…Use of Causal Language in Observational Studies of Obesity and Nutrition (2010)Use of Causal Language in Obs…Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Reporting and Interpretation …Narrative bias (“spin”) is common in randomised trials and systematic reviews of cannabinoids for pain (2024)Narrative bias (“spin”) is co…Development and Evaluation of a Framework for Identifying and Addressing Spin for Harms in Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2024)Development and Evaluation of…Spin and fragility in randomised controlled trials in the anaesthesia literature: a systematic review (2023)Spin and fragility in randomi…Influence of the statistical significance of results and spin on readers’ interpretation of the results in an abstract for a hypothetical clinical trial: a randomised trial (2022)Influence of the statistical …Meta‐research publications in dentistry: a review (2021)Meta‐research publications in…Abstracts for reports of randomized trials of COVID-19 interventions had low quality and high spin (2021)Abstracts for reports of rand…Safeguarding anaesthesia research from spin (2020)Safeguarding anaesthesia rese…Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Media Coverage of Medical Journals: Do the Best Articles Make the News? (2014)Interpretation of Results of Studies Evaluating an Intervention Highlighted in Google Health News: A Cross-Sectional Study of News (2015)Reporting of Limitations of Observational Research (2015)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Does Cultural Competency Training of Health Professionals Improve Patient Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm for Future Research (2010)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015 (2016)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention (2015)A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (2017)Causal language and strength of inference in academic and media articles shared in social media (CLAIMS): A systematic review (2018)The effect of shift work on eating habits: a systematic review (2018)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)How readers understand causal and correlational expressions used in news headlines. (2016)Peer reviewers identified spin in manuscripts of nonrandomized studies assessing therapeutic interventions, but their impact on spin in abstract conclusions was limited (2016)Misinformation in and about science (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers (2018)Evidence of questionable research practices in clinical prediction models (2023)CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors (2013)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Doug Altman: Driving critical appraisal and improvements in the quality of methodological and medical research (2020)REMARK guidelines for tumour biomarker study reporting: a remarkable history (2022)Structured reporting to improve transparency of analyses in prognostic marker studies (2022)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Reporting quality and spin in abstracts of randomized clinical trials of periodontal therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes (2020)Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to the treatment of proximal humeral fractures (2021)The presence and characteristics of ‘spin’ among randomized controlled trial abstracts in orthodontics (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Peer Review Matters: Research Quality and the Public Trust (2020)Ten simple rules for good research practice (2022)Overinterpretation and Misreporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Evidence of “Spin” (2013)Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention (2014)CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes828 cited
  • 2017‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review314 cited
  • 2013Belief beyond the evidence: using the proposed effect of breakfast on obesity to show 2 practices that distort scientific evidence155 cited
  • 2019Level and Prevalence of Spin in Published Cardiovascular Randomized Clinical Trial Reports With Statistically Nonsignificant Primary Outcomes94 cited
  • 2013Observational studies often make clinical practice recommendations: an empirical evaluation of authors' attitudes90 cited
  • 2010Use of Causal Language in Observational Studies of Obesity and Nutrition74 cited
  • 2018Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of otolaryngology randomized controlled trials50 cited
  • 2018Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in oncology: a systematic review36 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Safeguarding anaesthesia research from spin26 cited
  • 2023Spin and fragility in randomised controlled trials in the anaesthesia literature: a systematic review20 cited
  • 2021Abstracts for reports of randomized trials of COVID-19 interventions had low quality and high spin16 cited
  • 2024Narrative bias (“spin”) is common in randomised trials and systematic reviews of cannabinoids for pain14 cited
  • 2021Meta‐research publications in dentistry: a review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

13 cited
  • 2024Development and Evaluation of a Framework for Identifying and Addressing Spin for Harms in Systematic Reviews of Interventions11 cited
  • 2022Influence of the statistical significance of results and spin on readers’ interpretation of the results in an abstract for a hypothetical clinical trial: a randomised trial11 cited