Autonomy is equally important across East and West: Testing the cross‐cultural universality of self‐determination theory

Ma. Jenina N. Nalipay · Ronnel Bornasal King · Yuyang Cai

167 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Adolescence

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports Education, Achievement, and Giftedness Cultural Differences and Values

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Self-determination theory (SDT) posits the importance of three basic psychological needs (i.e., relatedness, autonomy, and competence) in promoting achievement. However, some cross-cultural researchers have cast doubt on the generalizability of the theory to non-Western cultures. The primary aim of the study was to test whether provision of support for relatedness, autonomy, and competence would be associated with achievement across both Western and Eastern cultures. METHOD: We drew on a subsample of students from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) (n = 92,325 students from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, UK, and USA (Western societies); and Hong Kong SAR, Japan, Macau SAR, Shanghai, South Korea, and Taipei (Eastern societies); 46,006 were females and 46,319 were males, with a mean age of 15.77 (SD = 0.29) years). We used multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA) and multi-group structural equation modeling (MG-SEM) to analyze the data. RESULTS: Provision of the three basic needs correlated positively with achievement across cultures, providing broad support for the cross-cultural universality of SDT. MG-SEM indicated that relatedness and autonomy support were equally important for student achievement in both Western and Eastern cultures, whereas competence support was found to be more important to students in the West than in the East. CONCLUSION: Findings support the cross-cultural relevance of SDT while at the same time highlighting important cultural variations such as greater importance of competence support in the West, suggesting the need to be cognizant of both cross-cultural universality and variability in motivational theorizing.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 167 citations exist upstream.

References

1999Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives 2000Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.1992Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit 2002Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance 2008Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement 2005Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research 2009Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta‐analyses relating to achievement 2013Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques

Cited by

2021Distance learning in higher education during COVID-19: The role of basic psychological needs and intrinsic motivation for persistence and procrastination–a multi-country study 2022Supporting students’ intrinsic motivation for online learning tasks: The effect of need-supportive task instructions on motivation, self-assessment, and task performance 2023A meta-analytic review of the relationships between autonomy support and positive learning outcomes 2024The role of self-efficacy, motivation, and perceived support of students' basic psychological needs in academic achievement

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.