References

• 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
• 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
• 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
• 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
• 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
• 2008Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study2,534 cited
• 2012Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals739 cited
• 2005Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals472 cited
• 2007Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials470 cited
• 2002Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality397 cited
• 1986A quality assessment of randomized control trials of primary treatment of breast cancer.195 cited
• 1990The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature188 cited
• 2007The reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery: A systematic review