Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Working 9 to 5, not the way to make an academic living: observational analysis of manuscript and peer review submissions over time

10 references·5 citing·50 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2010Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution1,885 cited
2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
2020The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity545 cited
2012Living with the H-Index? Metric Assemblages in the Contemporary Academy516 cited
2013China's Publication Bazaar256 cited
2000Faculty Time Allocation235 cited
2016Researchers’ Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century204 cited
2011Academic work from a comparative perspective: a survey of faculty working time across 13 countries203 cited
2019Academics Writing49 cited
2014Theorizing Cultural Work44 cited

Cited by

2022Understanding the peer review endeavor in scientific publishing32 cited
2023Analysis of peer reviewers’ response to invitations by gender and geographical region: cohort study of manuscripts reviewed at 19 biomedical journals before and during covid-19 pandemic32 cited
2021O custo da precariedade20 cited
2022Scientists are working overtime: when do scientists download scientific papers?13 cited
2023Is peer review duration shorter for attractive manuscripts?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

10 cited