SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Spin in Scientific Publications: A Frequent Detrimental Research Practice · Study

WorkSpin in Scientific Publications: A Frequent Detrimental Research Practice

Isabelle Boutron2019

OA

Workbronze2019

Spin in Scientific Publications: A Frequent Detrimental Research Practice

Isabelle Boutron

35 citations·0/0 files stored·Annals of Emergency Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Academic Publishing and Open Access Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 35 citations exist upstream.

References

2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials 2019Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news 2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes 2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials 2009Science communication reconsidered 2014Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial 2017‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review 2012Misrepresentation of Randomized Controlled Trials in Press Releases and News Coverage: A Cohort Study

Cited by

2021Over‐promotion and caution in abstracts of preprints during the COVID ‐19 crisis 2024Enhancing the trustworthiness of pain research: A call to action.2021Reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation issues (SPIN) in abstracts of orthodontic meta-analyses published from 2000 to 2020 2021Over 30% of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses Focused on Rotator Cuff Tear Treatments Contained Spin in the Abstract

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2019Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncturearticle · 7 shared references 2018Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of otolaryngology randomized controlled trialsarticle · 6 shared references 2024SPIN-PM: a consensus framework to evaluate the presence of spin in studies on prediction modelsarticle · 6 shared references 2019Evaluation of spin in abstracts of papers in psychiatry and psychology journalsarticle · 5 shared references 2022Trends in the Use of Promotional Language (Hype) in Abstracts of Successful National Institutes of Health Grant Applications, 1985-2020article · 5 shared references 2018Evaluation of spin within abstracts in obesity randomized clinical trials: A cross‐sectional reviewarticle · 5 shared references

Details

Year2019

Typeeditorial

Published2019-12-23

VenueAnnals of Emergency Medicine

ISSN-L0196-0644

Languageen

Citations35

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.11.002

openalex_workW2996736878

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2021Spin occurs in bariatric surgery randomized controlled trials with a statistically nonsignificant primary outcome: A systematic review

2022Project Rebuild the Evidence Base (REB): a method to interpret randomised clinical trials and their meta-analysis to present solid benefit-risk assessments to patients.

2023Identifying spin bias of nonsignificant findings in biomedical studies