Gender-based differences in letters of recommendation written for ophthalmology residency applicants

Soo Kyung Oh · Lynn K. Gordon · Stacy L. Pineles · Jamie B. Rosenberg · Irena Tsui

93 citations0/0 files storedBMC Medical Education

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Diversity and Career in Medicine Gender Studies in Language Medical Education and Admissions

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine whether gender-based differences may be present in letters of recommendation written for ophthalmology residency applicants. METHODS: All applications submitted through SF Match to the UCLA Stein Eye Institute Residency Training Program from the 2017-2018 application cycle were analyzed using validated text analysis software (Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (Austin, TX)). The main outcome measures were differences in language use in letters of recommendation by gender of applicant. RESULTS: Of 440 applicants, 254 (58%) were male and 186 (42%) were female. The two gender groups had similar United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 scores, undergraduate grade point averages (uGPA's), proportions of underrepresented minority (URM) applicants and Gold Humanism Honor Society members, numbers of academic and service activities listed, and gender distributions of their letter writers (all P values > 0.05). However, letters written for male applicants were determined to use more "authentic" words than those written for female applicants (mean difference, 0.800; 95% CI, 0.001-1.590; P = 0.047). Letters written for male applicants also contained more "leisure" words (mean difference, 0.056; 95% CI, 0.008-0.104; P = 0.023) and fewer "feel" words (mean difference, 0.033; 95% CI, 0.001-0.065; P = 0.041) and "biological processes" words (mean difference, 0.157; 95% CI, 0.017-0.297; P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: There were gender differences detected in recommendation letters in ophthalmology consistent with prior studies from other fields. Awareness of these differences may improve residency selection processes.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 93 citations exist upstream.

References

1999Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference.2012The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender 2004Language use of depressed and depression-vulnerable college students 1997Linguistic predictors of adaptive bereavement.2009Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences.2003Exploring the Color of Glass: Letters of Recommendation for Female and Male Medical Faculty 2000Detecting Deceit via Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior 2007A Linguistic Comparison of Letters of Recommendation for Male and Female Chemistry and Biochemistry Job Applicants

Cited by

2022Faculty Recruitment, Retention, and Representation in Leadership: An Evidence-Based Guide to Best Practices for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion from the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine 2021Use of artificial intelligence for gender bias analysis in letters of recommendation for general surgery residency candidates 2022Enhancing Diversity in the Ophthalmology Workforce 2020Linguistic Biases in Letters of Recommendation for Radiation Oncology Residency Applicants from 2015 to 2019

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.