Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A simulation study to compare robust tests for linear mixed‐effects meta‐regression

16 references·1 citing·36 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2010Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package20,412 cited
2009Introduction to Meta‐Analysis14,215 cited
2021Introduction to Meta‐Analysis9,785 cited
1981Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators5,682 cited
2008A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis2,562 cited
2003Improved tests for a random effects meta‐regression with a single covariate2,068 cited
2015Methods to estimate the between‐study variance and its uncertainty in meta‐analysis1,677 cited
2008Meta-Regression in Stata896 cited
1995A random‐effects regression model for meta‐analysis883 cited
2010Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data755 cited
2006Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta‐analysis397 cited
1998Meta-analysis of multiple outcomes by regression with random effects280 cited
2005Simple Heterogeneity Variance Estimation for Meta-Analysis254 cited
2014A comparison of procedures to test for moderators in mixed-effects meta-regression models.242 cited
2007Confidence Intervals for Standardized Effect Sizes: Theory, Application, and Implementation

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

237 cited

2018When should meta‐analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?178 cited

Cited by

2023Gone Fishin’: Addressing Completeness, Accuracy, and Representativeness in the Search and Coding Processes of Meta-Analyses in the Organizational Sciences7 cited