SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Measuring book impact via content-level academic review mining
16 references·1 citing·49 second hopsampled
Measuring book impact via content-level academic review mining (2020)Measuring book impact via content-level a…Interpreting correlations between citation counts and other indicators (2016)Interpreting correlations bet…Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis (2015)Use of positive and negative …Can A mazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books? (2015)Can A mazon.com reviews help …Structural Topic Models for Open‐Ended Survey Responses (2014)Structural Topic Models for O…Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics (2014)Do blog citations correlate w…Opportunities for and limitations of the B ook C itation I ndex (2013)Opportunities for and limitat…Hacia un ranking bibliométrico de editoriales científicas de libros. Primera aproximación utilizando el «Book Citation Index» (2012)Hacia un ranking bibliométric…Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus (2011)Assessing the citation impact…Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2010)Citations to the “Introductio…Why with bibliometrics the Humanities does not need to be the weakest link (2009)Why with bibliometrics the Hu…Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences (2009)Libcitations: A measure for c…Library Catalog Analysis as a tool in studies of social sciences and humanities: An exploratory study of published book titles in Economics (2008)Library Catalog Analysis as a…Testing novel quantitative indicators of research 'quality', esteem and 'user engagement': an economics pilot study (2007)Testing novel quantitative in…On the validity of citation counting in science evaluation: Content analyses of references and citations in psychological publications (2007)On the validity of citation c…Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (2006)Three options for citation tr…The scholarliness of published peer reviews: a bibliometric study of book reviews in selected social science fields (2002)The scholarliness of publishe…Why does library holding format really matter for book impact assessment?: Modelling the relationship between citations and altmetrics with print and electronic holdings (2021)Why does library holding form…The skewness of science (1992)Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact (2011)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics (2015)Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of M endeley user categories (2015)Altmetrics: an analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media (2016)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor (2008)Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals (2010)Beyond Coverage: Toward a Bibliometrics for the Humanities (2016)Taking scholarly books into account: current developments in five European countries (2016)The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences: An exploratory study using normalized G oogle S cholar data for the publications of a research institute (2016)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university (2009)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Interdisciplinarity and the intellectual base of literature studies: citation analysis of highly cited monographs (2010)The structure of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: A mapping on the basis of aggregated citations among 1,157 journals (2011)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books? (2016)Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data (2016)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: a longitudinal study of Nobel prize winners (2012)Finding Citations to Social Work Literature: The Relative Benefits of Using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar (2012)A systematic literature review on green supply chain management: Research implications and future perspectives (2018)Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability (2002)Computational Social Science (2009)Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts (2013)A Model of Text for Experimentation in the Social Sciences (2016)stm : An R Package for Structural Topic Models (2019)The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science (2020)From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis (1983)Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry (1991)Can we rank scholarly book publishers? A bibliometric experiment with the field of history (2014)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books (2010)A bibliometric model for identifying emerging research topics (2017)Gender differences in how scientists present the importance of their research: observational study (2019)Aspiring to greater intellectual humility in science (2021)Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases (2006)Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature (2007)The controversial policies of journal ratings: evaluating social sciences and humanities (2010)Criteria for assessing research quality in the humanities: a Delphi study among scholars of English literature, German literature and art history (2013)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2014Structural Topic Models for Open‐Ended Survey Responses1,967 cited
  • 2006Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science751 cited
  • 2010Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar265 cited
  • 2015Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis237 cited
  • 2014Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics207 cited
  • 2011Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus160 cited
  • 2009Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences117 cited
  • 2009Why with bibliometrics the Humanities does not need to be the weakest link97 cited
  • 2008Library Catalog Analysis as a tool in studies of social sciences and humanities: An exploratory study of published book titles in Economics89 cited
  • 2013Opportunities for and limitations of the B ook C itation I ndex86 cited
  • 2007On the validity of citation counting in science evaluation: Content analyses of references and citations in psychological publications80 cited
  • 2016Interpreting correlations between citation counts and other indicators62 cited
  • 2015Can A mazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books?62 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2002The scholarliness of published peer reviews: a bibliometric study of book reviews in selected social science fields49 cited
  • 2012Hacia un ranking bibliométrico de editoriales científicas de libros. Primera aproximación utilizando el «Book Citation Index»45 cited
  • 2007Testing novel quantitative indicators of research 'quality', esteem and 'user engagement': an economics pilot study36 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Why does library holding format really matter for book impact assessment?: Modelling the relationship between citations and altmetrics with print and electronic holdings8 cited