SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scientists’ incentives and attitudes toward public communication
3 references·16 citing·46 second hop
Scientists’ incentives and attitudes toward public communication (2020)Scientists’ incentives and attitudes towa…How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents? (2019)How significant are the publi…Understanding Scientists’ Willingness to Engage (2018)Understanding Scientists’ Wil…Scientists’ Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement (2016)Scientists’ Prioritization of…Promotional language and the adoption of innovative ideas in science (2024)Promotional language and the …Undergraduate STEM Students’ Science Communication Skills, Science Identity, and Science Self-Efficacy Influence Their Motivations and Behaviors in STEM Community Engagement (2023)Undergraduate STEM Students’ …“The chilling effect”: Medical scientists’ responses to audience feedback on their media appearances during the COVID-19 pandemic (2023)“The chilling effect”: Medica…Universities claim to value community-engaged scholarship: So why do they discourage it? (2022)Universities claim to value c…Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia (2022)Public engagement: Faculty li…Dissemination or participation? Exploring scientists’ definitions and science communication goals in the Netherlands (2022)Dissemination or participatio…Assessing motivations and barriers to science outreach within academic science research settings: A mixed-methods survey (2022)Assessing motivations and bar…A triangulated approach for understanding scientists’ perceptions of public engagement with science (2022)A triangulated approach for u…The types of visible scientists (2021)The types of visible scientis…The role of communication professionals in fostering a culture of public engagement (2021)The role of communication pro…Supporting quality in science communication: insights from the QUEST project (2021)Supporting quality in science…Scientists have favorable opinions on immunity certificates but raise concerns regarding fairness and inequality (2021)Scientists have favorable opi…Communicating research in academia and beyond: sources of self-efficacy for early career researchers (2021)Communicating research in aca…American Scientists’ Willingness to Use Different Communication Tactics (2021)American Scientists’ Willingn…Federal R&D funding: the bedrock of national innovation (2020)Federal R&D funding: the bedr…Contribution of Training to Scientists’ Public Engagement Intentions: A Test of Indirect Relationships Using Parallel Multiple Mediation (2020)Contribution of Training to S…The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (1988)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2008)Does Engagement in Advocacy Hurt the Credibility of Scientists? Results from a Randomized National Survey Experiment (2017)The Evolving Field of Risk Communication (2020)Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review (2001)Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence (2006)Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach (2009)Science public relations: The parallel, interwoven, and contrasting trajectories of public relations and science communication theory and practice (2020)Vaccination Discussion among Parents on Social Media: A Content Analysis of Comments on Parenting Blogs (2020)Consensus revisited: quantifying scientific agreement on climate change and climate expertise among Earth scientists 10 years later (2021)Chronicle of Higher Education (1998)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Ten simple rules for innovative dissemination of research (2020)Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations (2020)Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles (2021)Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. (1998)The spread of true and false news online (2018)Diffusion of innovations (2003)A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms (2005)What Influences Saturation? Estimating Sample Sizes in Focus Group Research (2019)How should we organize science communication trainings to achieve competencies? (2022)Our changing information ecosystem for science and why it matters for effective science communication (2025)Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks (2001)An Economic Model of Friendship: Homophily, Minorities, and Segregation (2009)Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics (2014)Science Communication Training Imparts Confidence and Influences Public Engagement Activity (2023)The importance of promoting scientific advocacy & outreach for trainees (2023)The Role of Stewards of Trust in Facilitating Trust in Science: A Multistakeholder View (2024)Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate (1992)Rule of Experts (2002)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)Comparative fit indexes in structural models. (1990)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2015)Inclusive Science Communication training for first-year STEM students promotes their identity and self-efficacy as scientists and science communicators (2023)Bildung gemeinsam gestalten: Empfehlungen für Projekte in Kooperation zwischen Wissenschaft, Politik und Praxis (2024)Science communication objectives and actual practices of science news websites as a showcase for gaps between theory and practice (2024)Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology (2008)Dark Participation (2018)Using Zoom Videoconferencing for Qualitative Data Collection: Perceptions and Experiences of Researchers and Participants (2019)Editorial: Science Communication in the Digital Age—New Actors, Environments, and Practices (2023)Why should we promote public engagement with science? (2014)Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers (2016)Examination of public perceptions of microbes and microbiomes in the United States reveals insights for science communication (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016Scientists’ Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement328 cited
  • 2018Understanding Scientists’ Willingness to Engage194 cited
  • 2019How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?190 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Universities claim to value community-engaged scholarship: So why do they discourage it?60 cited
  • 2023Undergraduate STEM Students’ Science Communication Skills, Science Identity, and Science Self-Efficacy Influence Their Motivations and Behaviors in STEM Community Engagement43 cited
  • 2022Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia42 cited
  • 2023“The chilling effect”: Medical scientists’ responses to audience feedback on their media appearances during the COVID-19 pandemic40 cited
  • 2020Contribution of Training to Scientists’ Public Engagement Intentions: A Test of Indirect Relationships Using Parallel Multiple Mediation38 cited
  • 2022Assessing motivations and barriers to science outreach within academic science research settings: A mixed-methods survey36 cited
  • 2022Dissemination or participation? Exploring scientists’ definitions and science communication goals in the Netherlands33 cited
  • 2024Promotional language and the adoption of innovative ideas in science26 cited
  • 2021Scientists have favorable opinions on immunity certificates but raise concerns regarding fairness and inequality26 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2021Supporting quality in science communication: insights from the QUEST project25 cited
  • 2021Communicating research in academia and beyond: sources of self-efficacy for early career researchers24 cited
  • 2022A triangulated approach for understanding scientists’ perceptions of public engagement with science24 cited
  • 2021The role of communication professionals in fostering a culture of public engagement22 cited
  • 2021American Scientists’ Willingness to Use Different Communication Tactics21 cited
  • 2021The types of visible scientists21 cited
  • 2020Federal R&D funding: the bedrock of national innovation20 cited