SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessing the reliability and validity of forensic science – an industry perspective
11 references·0 citing·33 second hop
Assessing the reliability and validity of forensic science – an industry perspective (2020)Assessing the reliability and validity of…The NAS Report: Ten Years of Response (2019)The NAS Report: Ten Years of …Forensic science evidence and the limits of cross-examination (2019)Forensic science evidence and…The international development of forensic science standards — A review (2018)The international development…Rethinking Expert Opinion Evidence (2017)Rethinking Expert Opinion Evi…The future of the National Institute of Forensic Science – implications for Australia and New Zealand (2016)The future of the National In…The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. (2013)The forensic confirmation bia…Expert Interpretation of Bitemark Injuries—A Contemporary Qualitative Study (2013)Expert Interpretation of Bite…Identifying Fingerprint Expertise (2011)Identifying Fingerprint Exper…Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions (2011)Accuracy and reliability of f…Statistical Evidence for the Similarity of the Human Dentition (2010)Statistical Evidence for the …Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Strengthening Forensic Scienc…The Individualization Fallacy in Forensic Science Evidence (2008)Forensics without uniqueness, conclusions without individualization: the new epistemology of forensic identification (2009)Collection and recording of radiological information for forensic purposes (2012)Does contextual information bias bitemark comparisons? (2014)Automated Identification from Dental Data (AutoIDD): A new development in digital forensics (2020)The Kappa Statistic in Reliability Studies: Use, Interpretation, and Sample Size Requirements (2005)Grounded Theory: An Exploration of Process and Procedure (2006)Modern scientific evidence : the law and science of expert testimony (2006)Effects of skin elasticity on bite mark distortion (2015)Epidermis and Enamel (2018)What made us ever think we could individualize using statistics? (1991)Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward (2009)Repeatability and Reproducibility of Decisions by Latent Fingerprint Examiners (2012)Trusting Judgements: How to Get the Best out of Experts (2015)Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community (2007)Expertise in Fingerprint Identification (2013)The Nature of Expertise in Fingerprint Matching: Experts Can Do a Lot with a Little (2014)Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners (2016)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)The Argumentative Theory: Predictions and Empirical Evidence (2016)Cognitive bias and blindness: A global survey of forensic science examiners. (2017)Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review (2019)International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2009)Bibliometric and text mining approaches to evaluate landfill design standards (2019)The development of forensic science standards in China (2020)Mind the gap: The challenges of sustainable forensic science service provision (2023)What do the experts know? Calibration, precision, and the wisdom of crowds among forensic handwriting experts (2018)Forensic science and the myth of adversarial testing (2019)Exploring juror evaluations of expert opinions using the Expert Persuasion Expectancy framework (2020)The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law (2012)Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them? (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward1,298 cited
  • 2013The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions.631 cited
  • 2011Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions349 cited
  • 2011Identifying Fingerprint Expertise118 cited
  • 2018The international development of forensic science standards — A review101 cited
  • 2010Statistical Evidence for the Similarity of the Human Dentition53 cited
  • 2017Rethinking Expert Opinion Evidence34 cited
  • 2019The NAS Report: Ten Years of Response18 cited
  • 2013Expert Interpretation of Bitemark Injuries—A Contemporary Qualitative Study18 cited
  • 2016The future of the National Institute of Forensic Science – implications for Australia and New Zealand13 cited
  • 2019Forensic science evidence and the limits of cross-examination12 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work