SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Statistical inference of Gwet’s AC 1 coefficient for multiple raters and binary outcomes
9 references·1 citing·31 second hop
Statistical inference of Gwet’s AC 1 coefficient for multiple raters and binary outcomes (2020)Statistical inference of Gwet’s AC 1 coef…Computing inter‐rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement (2006)Computing inter‐rater reliabi…Inference Procedures for Assessing Interobserver Agreement among Multiple Raters (2001)Inference Procedures for Asse…Bias, prevalence and kappa (1993)Bias, prevalence and kappaHigh agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes (1990)High agreement but low Kappa:…A rEAPPRAISAL OF THE KAPPA COEFFICIENT (1988)A rEAPPRAISAL OF THE KAPPA CO…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…A One-Way Components of Variance Model for Categorical Data (1977)A One-Way Components of Varia…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)A Coefficient of Agreement fo…Reliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Scale Coding (1955)Reliability of Content Analys…Kappa and AC1/2 statistics: beyond the paradox (2021)Kappa and AC1/2 statistics: b…MISINTERPRETATION AND MISUSE OF THE KAPPA STATISTIC (1987)Kappa coefficients in medical research (2002)Agreement between self-report questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failure (2004)Measuring inter-rater reliability for nominal data – which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate? (2016)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. (1971)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2011)A REPRESENTATION OF THE JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSES TO N DICHOTOMOUS ITEMS (1959)2 x 2 Kappa Coefficients: Measures of Agreement or Association (1989)Assessing Agreement between Multiple Raters with Missing Rating Information, Applied to Breast Cancer Tumour Grading (2008)Sample Size Requirements for Training to a κ Agreement Criterion on Clinical Dementia Ratings (2010)Bias-corrected estimator for intraclass correlation coefficient in the balanced one-way random effects model (2012)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)An Application of Hierarchical Kappa-type Statistics in the Assessment of Majority Agreement among Multiple Observers (1977)Large sample variance of kappa in the case of different sets of raters. (1979)Cooperative or Controlling? The Effects of CEO-Board Relations and the Content of Interlocks on the Formation of Joint Ventures (1999)Leadership competencies for implementing planned organizational change (2010)A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples (2013)The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application (2020)High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes (1990)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2010)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics (2008)Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. (2012)The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions (2013)Content Analysis in Consumer Research (1977)Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis (1999)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales42,335 cited
  • 1990High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes3,024 cited
  • 1993Bias, prevalence and kappa2,175 cited
  • 2006Computing inter‐rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement2,139 cited
  • 1955Reliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Scale Coding1,849 cited
  • 1988A rEAPPRAISAL OF THE KAPPA COEFFICIENT500 cited
  • 1977A One-Way Components of Variance Model for Categorical Data478 cited
  • 2001Inference Procedures for Assessing Interobserver Agreement among Multiple Raters36 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Kappa and AC1/2 statistics: beyond the paradox9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work