Publishing while editor: Transparency and behaviour in public administration journals

Abstract

Abstract Journal editors serve as gatekeepers of knowledge, a role critical to preserving the quality and standards of good research. Some scholars have questioned whether editors have taken advantage of their position to publish their own work. To understand the extent to which editors of public administration journals self‐publish, we examined publishing patterns over a 20‐year period. We collected the names of editors from the mastheads of 13 generalist public administration journals from 1997 to 2016 and used data indexed from Web of Science to look at articles published in those journals during the same time. We found that while self‐publishing behaviour is not common across the entire field, it is a trend for certain journals and individuals. We also found the practice of self‐publishing is influenced by whether an individual served in a primary editorial role (e.g., editor‐in‐chief), length of editorial service, and overall scholarly productivity. We discuss appropriateness and ethical implications of the practice.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.