What Makes Logistics Integration More Effective? Governance from Contractual and Relational Perspectives

Baofeng Huo · Xiande Zhao

74 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Business Logistics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management Customer Service Quality and Loyalty Quality and Supply Management

Abstract

Third‐party logistics (3PL) user–provider integration is attracting increasing attention from both academics and practitioners. However, it remains unclear how best to adopt governance mechanisms to safeguard 3PL user–provider integration (e.g., information sharing and process coordination). Based on transaction cost economics and social exchange theory, this study examined the individual and joint effects of contractual (e.g., detailed contracts and contract application) and relational governance (e.g., trust and relational norms) on 3PL user–provider integration for operational performance. We conducted a survey involving 247 3PL service users and analyzed the conceptual model using the method of structural equation modeling. The results showed that process coordination improved operational performance, while information sharing alone did not significantly improve operational performance but complemented the role of process coordination in improving operational performance. In addition, having detailed contracts was positively related to process coordination, while contract application was positively related to information sharing. Trust was not significantly related to information sharing or process coordination, while relational norms were positively related to both. Finally, three joint effects on 3PL user–provider integration were found. Two of them were substitutional (detailed contracts and relational norms; contract application and trust), and one was complementary (detailed contracts and trust). This study makes several theoretical contributions and provides novel guidelines for 3PL relationship development.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 74 citations exist upstream.

References

1981Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error 2003Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.1985Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness 2011PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet 2015A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)1999Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams 1986The Economic Institutions of Capitalism 1977Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys

Cited by

2021Competitive advantage in SMEs: effect of supply chain management practices, logistics capabilities and logistics integration in a developing country 2021The role of strategic collaborations and relational capital in enhancing product performance – a moderated-mediated model 2023Supply chain visibility types and contextual characteristics: A literature‐based synthesis 2023Commitment or rent-seeking? Government incentive policies for ESG reporting in sustainable e-commerce logistics 2022Environmental uncertainty, relationship commitment, and information sharing: the social exchange theory and transaction cost economics perspectives

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.