SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Will the Quality of Research Remain the Same During the COVID-19 Pandemic?
1 references·9 citing·44 second hop
Will the Quality of Research Remain the Same During the COVID-19 Pandemic? (2020)Will the Quality of Research Remain the S…A publishing pandemic during the COVID-19 pandemic: how challenging can it become? (2020)A publishing pandemic during …Comparing the prevalence of statistical reporting inconsistencies in COVID-19 preprints and matched controls: a registered report (2023)Comparing the prevalence of s…The consistency of peer-reviewers: Assessment of separate parts of the manuscripts vs final recommendations (2022)The consistency of peer-revie…Reporting COVID-19 preprints: fast science in newspapers in the United States, the United Kingdom and Brazil (2022)Reporting COVID-19 preprints:…Poor reporting quality of observational clinical studies comparing treatments of COVID-19 – a retrospective cross-sectional study (2022)Poor reporting quality of obs…A topic trend analysis on COVID-19 literature (2022)A topic trend analysis on COV…Excesso e alta velocidade das informações científicas (2021)Excesso e alta velocidade das…COVID-19 meta-analyses: a scoping review and quality assessment (2021)COVID-19 meta-analyses: a sco…Content Analysis and Characterization of Medical Tweets During the Early Covid-19 Pandemic (2021)Content Analysis and Characte…Completeness of reporting for COVID-19 case reports, January to April 2020: a meta-epidemiologic study (2021)Completeness of reporting for…“Questionable” peer review in the publishing pandemic during the time of COVID-19: implications for policy makers and stakeholders (2020)COVID-19 in Latin America: A Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Publications in Health (2020)Early in the epidemic: impact of preprints on global discourse about COVID-19 transmissibility (2020)Keep up with the latest coronavirus research (2020)Social responsibility of medical journal: a concern for COVID-19 pandemic (2020)Research that sparked attention on the social Web in 2020: an Altmetric analysis of “top 100” articles (2022)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Coronavirus Goes Viral: Quantifying the COVID-19 Misinformation Epidemic on Twitter (2020)A Qualitative Exploration of the Teaching- and Learning-Related Content Nursing Students Share to Social Media (2021)The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development (2013)CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document (2017)Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports (2018)Bibliometric Analysis on Bibliometric Studies of Case Reports in the Medical Field (2022)Editorial: The Increasing Relevance of Case Reports in Medical Education and Clinical Practice – and How to Write Them (2023)CARE-radiology statement explanation and elaboration: reporting guideline for radiological case reports (2024)Preprints: An underutilized mechanism to accelerate outbreak science (2018)How swamped preprint servers are blocking bad coronavirus research (2020)Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19 (2020)Preprint servers and journals: rivals or allies? (2025)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A scoping review establishes need for consensus guidance on reporting health equity in observational studies (2023)Comparison of journal and top publisher self-citation rates in COVID-19 research (2024)Gatekeeping should be conserved in the open science era (2024)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power (2017)How to fight an infodemic (2020)Impact of Covid-19 on the media system. Communicative and democratic consequences of news consumption during the outbreak (2020)Framing COVID-19 Preprint Research as Uncertain: A Mixed-Method Study of Public Reactions (2023)Making science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Access research (2024)Unreviewed science in the news: The evolution of preprint media coverage from 2014–2021 (2024)stm : An R Package for Structural Topic Models (2019)Improving the translation of search strategies using the Polyglot Search Translator: a randomized controlled trial (2020)Lockdown, quarantine measures, and social distancing: Associations with depression, anxiety and distress at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic among adults from Germany (2020)Artificial intelligence and network science as tools to illustrate academic research evolution in interdisciplinary fields: The case of Italian design (2025)The American Psychological Association (1919)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020A publishing pandemic during the COVID-19 pandemic: how challenging can it become?36 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Reporting COVID-19 preprints: fast science in newspapers in the United States, the United Kingdom and Brazil28 cited
  • 2022Poor reporting quality of observational clinical studies comparing treatments of COVID-19 – a retrospective cross-sectional study22 cited
  • 2022The consistency of peer-reviewers: Assessment of separate parts of the manuscripts vs final recommendations15 cited
  • 2022A topic trend analysis on COVID-19 literature14 cited
  • 2021Completeness of reporting for COVID-19 case reports, January to April 2020: a meta-epidemiologic study13 cited
  • 2021Content Analysis and Characterization of Medical Tweets During the Early Covid-19 Pandemic12 cited
  • 2021COVID-19 meta-analyses: a scoping review and quality assessment10 cited
  • 2021Excesso e alta velocidade das informações científicas7 cited
  • 2023Comparing the prevalence of statistical reporting inconsistencies in COVID-19 preprints and matched controls: a registered report6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work