Social Relationships and Loneliness in Late Adulthood: Disparities by Sexual Orientation

Ning Hsieh · Hui Liu

81 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Marriage and the Family

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy Aging and Gerontology Research Health disparities and outcomes

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This is the first national study to examine disparities in loneliness and social relationships by sexual orientation in late adulthood in the United States. BACKGROUND: Prior studies have shown that lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals often struggle with social relationships across the life course, likely because of stigma related to sexual orientation. However, little is known about whether loneliness is more prevalent among LGB people than among other groups in late adulthood, and if so, which relationships contribute to the loneliness gap. METHOD: We analyzed data from a nationally representative sample of older adults from the 2015-2016 National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (N = 3,567) to examine the disparity in loneliness by sexual orientation and identify links between this disparity and multiple dimensions of social relationships, including partner, family, friend, and community relationships. RESULTS: Older LGB adults were significantly lonelier than their heterosexual counterparts, primarily due to a lower likelihood of having a partner and, to a lesser extent, lower levels of family support and greater friend strain. While they were also disadvantaged in the size of close family and frequency of community participation, these factors were less relevant to their loneliness. Overall, the conventionally defined inner layers of relationships (partnership and family) contributed more to the loneliness disparity than the outer layers of relationships (friends and community). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that strengthening the partnerships and family relationships of sexual minorities is essential to reducing the loneliness gap.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 81 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence.2010Loneliness Matters: A Theoretical and Empirical Review of Consequences and Mechanisms 2004A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys 2002Assessing “Neighborhood Effects”: Social Processes and New Directions in Research 2010Social Relationships and Health: A Flashpoint for Health Policy 2012The Health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: building a foundation for better understanding 1992Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory.1983Loneliness: A Source Book of Current Theory, Research and Therapy

Cited by

2022Psychometric Evaluation of Three Versions of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Full, Eight-Item, and Three-Item Versions) among Sexual Minority Men in Taiwan 2023Life events, social conditions and residential mobility among older adults 2023Social relationships in later life: Does marital status matter?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.