SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Psychology: a Giant with Feet of Clay · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticlePsychology: a Giant with Feet of Clay

Andrea Zagaria2020

OA

Articlegreen2020

Psychology: a Giant with Feet of Clay

Andrea Zagaria · Agata Maria Claudia Ando · Alessandro Zennaro

85 citations·0/0 files stored·Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology Philosophy and History of Science Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 85 citations exist upstream.

References

2013Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1954A Theory of Social Comparison Processes 1964The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.1979The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme 1992The Psychological Foundations of Culture 1978The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes

Cited by

2020Psychology’s Status as a Science: Peculiarities and Intrinsic Challenges. Moving Beyond its Current Deadlock Towards Conceptual Integration 2020The Semiotic Paradigm in Psychology. A Mature Weltanschauung for the Definition of Semiotic Mind 2022Rating scales institutionalise a network of logical errors and conceptual problems in research practices: A rigorous analysis showing ways to tackle psychology’s crises 2020Psychology Today: Still in Denial, Still Outdated 2020The Principle of Inversion: Why the Quantitative-Empirical Paradigm Cannot Serve as a Unifying Basis for Psychology as an Academic Discipline

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2021Pluralidade de objeto versus pluralismo de concepções em teorias psicológicasarticle · 8 shared references 2015Psychology as a Science within Comte's Hypothesized Hierarchy: Empirical Investigations and Conceptual Implicationsarticle · 7 shared references 2010A New Framework for Psychologyarticle · 7 shared references 2018What Is Psychology?chapter · 7 shared references 2000Are Evolutionary Explanations Unfalsifiable? Evolutionary Psychology and the Lakatosian Philosophy of Sciencearticle · 6 shared references 1997Pursuing Unity in a Fragmented Psychology: Problems and Prospectsarticle · 6 shared references

Details

Year2020

Typearticle

Published2020-04-15

VenueIntegrative Psychological and Behavioral Science

ISSN-L1932-4502

Languageen

Citations85

Files0 public / 0

ShelfAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

Identifiers

doi10.1007/s12124-020-09524-5

openalex_workW3016324768

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2022Compartmentalization and unity of professional psychology. A road map for the future of the discipline

2020Concerning Paradigmatic Status of Psychological Science: For a Flexible and Flowing Psychology in the Face of Practical and Theoretical Challenges

2020Moving On Our Feet: For a Nomadic Psychology