Report2020

Determinants of Disparities in Covid-19 Job Losses

Laura Montenovo · Xuan Jiang · Felipe Andrés Lozano-Rojas · Ian M. Schmutte · Kosali Ilayperuma Simon · Bruce A. Weinberg +1 more

434 citations0/0 files storedNational Bureau of Economic Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Labor market dynamics and wage inequality COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts Employment and Welfare Studies

Abstract

We make several contributions to understanding the socio-demographic divide in early labor market responses to the U.S. COVID-19 epidemic and its policies, benchmarked against two previous recessions.First, monthly Current Population Survey (CPS) data show greater declines in employment in April and May 2020 (relative to February) for Hispanics, younger workers, and those with high school degrees and some college.Between April and May, all the demographic subgroups considered regained some employment.Re-employment in May was broadly proportional to the employment drop that occurred through April, except for Blacks who experienced a smaller rebound.Further, we show that compared to the 2001 recession and the Great Recession, employment losses in the early COVID-19 recession were smaller for groups with very low or very high (vs.medium) education.Second, we show that job loss was larger in occupations that require more interpersonal contact and that cannot be performed remotely.Third, we find pre-COVID-19 sorting of workers into occupations and industries along demographic lines can explain a sizeable portion of the gender, race, and ethnic gaps in new unemployment.For example, while women did suffer more job losses than men, their disproportionate pre-epidemic sorting into remote work compatible occupations shielded women from what would have been even larger employment losses during the epidemic.However, there remain substantial gaps in employment losses across groups that cannot be explained by socioeconomic differences.We find some larger gaps in labor market impacts when we consider the "employed but absent from work" measure present in the CPS, in addition to the more traditional employment and unemployment measures.We conclude with a discussion of policy lessons and future research needs implied by the disparities in early labor market losses from the COVID-19 crisis.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 434 citations exist upstream.

References

1973Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets 1973Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates 2020How many jobs can be done at home?2020The Impact of COVID-19 on Gender Equality 1994On discrimination and the decomposition of wage differentials 2020Fear, lockdown, and diversion: Comparing drivers of pandemic economic decline 2020 2020Labor Markets During the COVID-19 Crisis: A Preliminary View 2019Beyond the Great Recession: Labor Market Polarization and Ongoing Fertility Decline in the United States

Cited by

2021Gender differences in couples’ division of childcare, work and mental health during COVID-19 2020Early evidence of the impacts of COVID-19 on minority unemployment 2021What is the exchange rate volatility response to COVID-19 and government interventions?2020The Heterogeneous and Regressive Consequences of COVID-19: Evidence from High Quality Panel Data 2020Effects of Social Distancing Policy on Labor Market Outcomes

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.