SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Pandemic researchers — recruit your own best critics
0 references·11 citing·43 second hop
Pandemic researchers — recruit your own best critics (2020)Pandemic researchers — recruit your own b…International initiatives to enhance awareness and uptake of open research in psychology: a systematic mapping review (2025)International initiatives to …Bestiary of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology (2025)Bestiary of Questionable Rese…Shifting the Level of Selection in Science (2023)Shifting the Level of Selecti…Perspectives on scientific error (2023)Perspectives on scientific er…Error tight: Exercises for lab groups to prevent research mistakes. (2023)Error tight: Exercises for la…Honest signaling in academic publishing (2021)Honest signaling in academic …A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers (2021)A credit-like rating system t…Silently withdrawn or retracted preprints related to Covid-19 are a scholarly threat and a potential public health risk: theoretical arguments and suggested recommendations (2020)Silently withdrawn or retract…Improving open and rigorous science: ten key future research opportunities related to rigor, reproducibility, and transparency in scientific research (2020)Improving open and rigorous s…Desafíos de las publicaciones científicas en la pandemia por el nuevo coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) (2020)Desafíos de las publicaciones…Raising the value of research studies in psychological science by increasing the credibility of research reports: The Transparent Psi Project - Preprint (2019)Raising the value of research…Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)No reward without responsibility: Focus on peer review reports (2024)COVID-19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives (2020)The Twitter pandemic: The critical role of Twitter in the dissemination of medical information and misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)Should preprints and peer-reviewed papers be assigned equal status? (2022)Institutional logics in the open science practices of university–industry research collaboration (2023)The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review (2023)The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism (1970)Job Market Signaling (1973)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help (2021)The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review (2022)Promoting an open research culture (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Redefine statistical significance (2017)Anomalous information reception by mediums: A meta-analysis of the scientific evidence (2020)Reproducible Research in R: A Tutorial on how to Do the Same Thing More Than Once (2021)Sorting Things Out (1999)The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Academic Librarians and Their Role in Disseminating Accurate Knowledge and Information about the Gray Zone in Predatory Publishing (2022)Progressive and degenerative journals: on the growth and appraisal of knowledge in scholarly publishing (2022)Can ChatGPT identify predatory biomedical and dental journals? A cross-sectional content analysis (2024)Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research (2013)The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) (2015)The preregistration revolution (2018)How to fix your scientific coding errors (2022)Reproducibility in Small- N Treatment Research: A Tutorial Using Examples From Aphasiology (2022)Open Science at Clinical Psychological Science : Reflections on Progress, Lessons Learned, and Suggestions for Continued Improvement (2024)Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. (1968)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)A theory of justice original editionCulture and the Evolutionary Process (1986)On the mechanics of economic development (1988)Process and Bureaucracy: Scientific Reform as Civilisation (2022)Modelling Scientific Communities (2023)The costs of competition in distributing scarce research funds (2024)False-Positive Psychology (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2021Honest signaling in academic publishing37 cited
  • 2023Shifting the Level of Selection in Science36 cited
  • 2021A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers29 cited
  • 2020Silently withdrawn or retracted preprints related to Covid-19 are a scholarly threat and a potential public health risk: theoretical arguments and suggested recommendations28 cited
  • 2023Error tight: Exercises for lab groups to prevent research mistakes.19 cited
  • 2025Bestiary of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology18 cited
  • 2023Perspectives on scientific error16 cited
  • 2019Raising the value of research studies in psychological science by increasing the credibility of research reports: The Transparent Psi Project - Preprint14 cited
  • 2020Improving open and rigorous science: ten key future research opportunities related to rigor, reproducibility, and transparency in scientific research13 cited
  • 2025International initiatives to enhance awareness and uptake of open research in psychology: a systematic mapping review8 cited
  • 2020Desafíos de las publicaciones científicas en la pandemia por el nuevo coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2)7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work