SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The open access financial model hinders the growth of medical physics research in low‐ and middle‐income countries
11 references·0 citing·39 second hop
The open access financial model hinders the growth of medical physics research in low‐ and middle‐income countries (2020)The open access financial model hinders t…Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis (2019)Blacklists and Whitelists To …WASP: Is open access publishing the way forward? A review of the different ways in which research papers can be published (2018)WASP: Is open access publishi…Who needs access to research? Exploring the societal impact of open access (2017)Who needs access to research?…There are too many medical physics journals! (2016)There are too many medical ph…How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)How open science helps resear…The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention (2015)The open access advantage con…Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access (2015)Disrupting the subscription j…Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access (2015)Disrupting the subscription j…Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing (2011)Open access, readership, cita…Diffusion of treatment research: does open access matter? (2008)Diffusion of treatment resear…Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2008)Berlin Declaration on Open Ac…Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? (2004)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)The Empirical Status of Empirically Supported Psychotherapies: Assumptions, Findings, and Reporting in Controlled Clinical Trials. (2004)Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles (2006)Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication (2012)Making Open Science a Reality (2015)The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism (1970)Job Market Signaling (1973)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Nipype: A Flexible, Lightweight and Extensible Neuroimaging Data Processing Framework in Python (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition (2018)Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation (1990)The Role of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge (1999)What Is Citizen Science? – A Scientometric Meta-Analysis (2016)Does engagement predict research use? An analysis of The Conversation Annual Survey 2016 (2018)Who are the users of national open access journals? The case of the Finnish Journal.fi platform (2021)Achieving Global Open Access (2024)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): How to write a scientific thesis (2018)WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): Structuring a scientific paper (2018)Sustainable scientific publishing: a pilot survey on stakeholder motivations and opinions (2024)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Problematizing ‘predatory publishing’: A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences (2020)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Multi-Stage Open Peer Review: Scientific Evaluation Integrating the Strengths of Traditional Peer Review with the Virtues of Transparency and Self-Regulation (2012)COVID-19 in Higher Education Literature Database (CHELD V1): An open access systematic literature review database with coding rules (2020)From Open Access to Open Science: The Path From Scientific Reality to Open Scientific Communication (2020)Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing (2019)Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016How open science helps researchers succeed878 cited
  • 2011Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing317 cited
  • 2015The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention286 cited
  • 2008Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities281 cited
  • 2015Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access150 cited
  • 2019Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis131 cited
  • 2015Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access126 cited
  • 2018WASP: Is open access publishing the way forward? A review of the different ways in which research papers can be published30 cited
  • 2008Diffusion of treatment research: does open access matter?27 cited
  • 2017Who needs access to research? Exploring the societal impact of open access26 cited
  • 2016There are too many medical physics journals!11 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work