SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Vegetation classification goes open access
11 references·2 citing·42 second hop
Vegetation classification goes open access (2020)Vegetation classification goes open accessProjekt DEAL – Springer Nature Publish and Read Agreement (2020)Projekt DEAL – Springer Natur…Global trait–environment relationships of plant communities (2018)Global trait–environment rela…The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The academic, economic and so…Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access (2015)Disrupting the subscription j…The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)The Development of Open Acces…Open Access and Global Participation in Science (2009)Open Access and Global Partic…Does double-blind review benefit female authors? (2008)Does double-blind review bene…Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors (2007)Double-blind review favours i…Single- versus double-blind reviewing (2006)Single- versus double-blind r…Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles (2006)Citation Advantage of Open Ac…Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? (2004)Do Open-Access Articles Have …Vegetation Classification and Survey is performing well (2024)Vegetation Classification and…Priorities in journal selection for authors, reviewers, editors, librarians and science funders (2023)Priorities in journal selecti…Women's underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. (2009)Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science (2011)Bias in peer review (2012)The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)The growth and number of journals (2003)Scientific Journal Publishing: Yearly Volume and Open Access Availability. (2009)Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)US and Non-US Submissions (1998)Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)Women in Academic Science (2014)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals (2004)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason (1975)The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access (2004)Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics (2015)Are women prejudiced against women? (1968)Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review (2017)Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011-2019 (2020)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact (2013)Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing (2019)Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review (2023)Evolution of interdisciplinarity in biodiversity science (2019)A palaeoecological perspective on the transformation of the tropical Andes by early human activity (2022)Pre‐contact and post‐colonial ecological legacies shape Surinamese rainforests (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles924 cited
  • 2011The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009874 cited
  • 2018Global trait–environment relationships of plant communities712 cited
  • 2004Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact?694 cited
  • 2016The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review629 cited
  • 2007Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors569 cited
  • 2009Open Access and Global Participation in Science264 cited
  • 2015Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access126 cited
  • 2006Single- versus double-blind reviewing118 cited
  • 2008Does double-blind review benefit female authors?84 cited
  • 2020Projekt DEAL – Springer Nature Publish and Read Agreement13 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Vegetation Classification and Survey is performing well7 cited
  • 2023Priorities in journal selection for authors, reviewers, editors, librarians and science funders5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work