SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Study of Grant Support from Russian Scientific Foundations to Domestic Publications in Leading International Journals (based on Data from Scopus and Web of Science, the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, and the Russian Science Foundation)
16 references·0 citing·46 second hop
A Study of Grant Support from Russian Scientific Foundations to Domestic Publications in Leading International Journals (based on Data from Scopus and Web of Science, the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, and the Russian Science Foundation) (2020)A Study of Grant Support from Russian Sci…Publishing and Promotion in Economics: The Tyranny of the Top Five (2020)Publishing and Promotion in E…Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science (2018)Trends in Russian research ou…Publishing and Promotion in Economics: The Tyranny of the Top Five (2018)Publishing and Promotion in E…Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals (2018)Gender disparities in high-qu…Discrepancies among Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed coverage of funding information in medical journal articles (2018)Discrepancies among Scopus, W…Funding acknowledgments in the Web of Science: completeness and accuracy of collected data (2017)Funding acknowledgments in th…Funding Data from Publication Acknowledgments: Coverage, Uses, and Limitations (2016)Funding Data from Publication…Funding acknowledgment analysis: Queries and caveats (2016)Funding acknowledgment analys…Characterization, description, and considerations for the use of funding acknowledgement data in Web of Science (2016)Characterization, description…A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)A review of the literature on…The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The Metric Tide: Report of th…The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The Metric Tide: Independent …The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The journal coverage of Web o…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)The publishing delay in schol…Systematic grant and funding body acknowledgement data for publications: new dimensions and new controversies for research policy and evaluation (2011)Systematic grant and funding …Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review (2021)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process (2000)Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal (2011)Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure (2012)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)CORD-19: The COVID-19 Open Research Dataset (2020)The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Peer Review (1994)Bias in peer review (2012)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)The effect of funding on the outputs of biomedical research (1998)Funding acknowledgement analysis: an enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: the case of nanotechnology (2011)Approaching the “reward triangle”: General analysis of the presence of funding acknowledgments and “peer interactive communication” in scientific publications (2012)Sustainability in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda (2022)Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women (1977)Do Women Shy Away From Competition? Do Men Compete Too Much? (2007)Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012)The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science (2020)Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions (2021)Gender Disparity in Citations in High-Impact Journal Articles (2021)Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance (2001)Measuring Science (2004)Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science (2016)Web of Science and Scopus language coverage (2019)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)Incentives and creativity: evidence from the academic life sciences (2011)Motivating Innovation (2011)More Is Different … and Complex!: The Case for Agent-Based Macroeconomics (2019)pybliometrics: Scriptable bibliometrics using a Python interface to Scopus (2019)How the Publish-or-Perish Principle Divides a Science: The Case of Academic Economists (2020)Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (2014)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis6,284 cited
  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics3,281 cited
  • 2016A review of the literature on citation impact indicators1,502 cited
  • 2015The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management924 cited
  • 2015The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management634 cited
  • 2013The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals478 cited
  • 2020Publishing and Promotion in Economics: The Tyranny of the Top Five453 cited
  • 2018Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals449 cited
  • 2018Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science141 cited
  • 2016Characterization, description, and considerations for the use of funding acknowledgement data in Web of Science119 cited
  • 2018Discrepancies among Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed coverage of funding information in medical journal articles115 cited
  • 2018Publishing and Promotion in Economics: The Tyranny of the Top Five92 cited
  • 2011Systematic grant and funding body acknowledgement data for publications: new dimensions and new controversies for research policy and evaluation86 cited
  • 2016Funding acknowledgment analysis: Queries and caveats

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

80 cited
  • 2016Funding Data from Publication Acknowledgments: Coverage, Uses, and Limitations75 cited
  • 2017Funding acknowledgments in the Web of Science: completeness and accuracy of collected data73 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.