SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessment of the reporting quality of double-blind RCTs for ischemic stroke based on the CONSORT statement
16 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Assessment of the reporting quality of double-blind RCTs for ischemic stroke based on the CONSORT statement (2020)Assessment of the reporting quality of do…Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 (2016)Global, regional, and nationa…GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating t…The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed (2010)The quality of reports of ran…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials (2007)Impact of allocation concealm…Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Does the CONSORT checklist im…Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)Impact factor: a valid measur…Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality (2002)Quality of Reporting of Rando…Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)Value of Flow Diagrams in Rep…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Does quality of reports of ra…CONSORT: An Evolving Tool to Help Improve the Quality of Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (1998)CONSORT: An Evolving Tool to …Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 (2012)Global, regional, and national age–sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 (2014)Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 (2016)Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 (2017)Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 359 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (2018)Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021 (2024)GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency (2011)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,270 cited
  • 2016Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 20156,589 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
  • 2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
  • 2003Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?584 cited
  • 2010The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed503 cited
  • 2007Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

470 cited
  • 2002Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality397 cited
  • 2001Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials316 cited
  • 1998CONSORT: An Evolving Tool to Help Improve the Quality of Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials241 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.