Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Practical issues encountered while determining Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes

16 references·3 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1992The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.33,913 cited
1992The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)30,420 cited
1989Measurement of health status5,084 cited
2006Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance2,954 cited
2007Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes2,431 cited
1989Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status2,396 cited
1999Further Evidence Supporting an SEM-Based Criterion for Identifying Meaningful Intra-Individual Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life861 cited
2014A Guide to Handling Missing Data in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Conducted Within Randomised Controlled Trials670 cited
1999Linking Clinical Relevance and Statistical significance in Evaluating Intra-Individual Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life569 cited
2000The Concept of Clinically Meaningful Difference in Health-Related Quality of Life Research488 cited
1996Health Status Measures: Strategies and Analytic Methods for Assessing Change Scores433 cited
1996Assessing the minimal important difference in symptoms: A comparison of two techniques372 cited
2009Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods356 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1996Interpretation of change scores in ordinal clinical scales and health status measures: The whole may not equal the sum of the parts234 cited

1993Assessing the clinical importance of symptomatic improvements. An illustration in rheumatology182 cited

2010The minimal detectable change should not replace the minimal important difference154 cited

Cited by

2022Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports744 cited
2022Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Protocols299 cited
2024Overall Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review5 cited