SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Online informationssøgning i en overgangstid
5 references·0 citing·22 second hop
Online informationssøgning i en overgangstid (2020)Online informationssøgning i en overgangs…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Online development in the Nordic countries (2018)Online development in the Nor…Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews (2013)Is the coverage of google sch…YOUNG ADULTS' CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT OF WIKIPEDIA (2010)YOUNG ADULTS' CREDIBILITY ASS…The capture–mark–recapture technique can be used as a stopping rule when searching in systematic reviews (2008)The capture–mark–recapture te…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey (2005)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)The Global Evidence Mapping Initiative: Scoping research in broad topic areas (2011)Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review (2016)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey (2004)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis (2011)Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence (2014)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (1995)Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. (1996)Digital Media Literacy Education and Online Civic and Political Participation (2012)Psychological Approaches to Credibility Assessment Online (2015)The Wealth of Networks (2017)How Good Is This Page? Benefits and Limits of Prompting on Adolescents’ Evaluation of Web Information Quality (2019)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd Edition) (2017)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,812 cited
  • 2013Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews362 cited
  • 2010YOUNG ADULTS' CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT OF WIKIPEDIA82 cited
  • 2008The capture–mark–recapture technique can be used as a stopping rule when searching in systematic reviews47 cited
  • 2018Online development in the Nordic countries3 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work