Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective

Kamini Gupta · Donal Crilly · Thomas Greckhamer

221 citations0/0 files storedStrategic Management Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Labor Movements and Unions Political Influence and Corporate Strategies

Abstract

Abstract Research summary Research documents the performance effects of attending to shareholders and treating employees well but underplays national differences in the relative power of labor and capital. We advance a configurational perspective that acknowledges the fit between stakeholder engagement, context, firm attributes and performance. As a cornerstone of this perspective, we develop a typology of stakeholder engagement strategies expressing how firms navigate the tension between conforming with local expectations—by prioritizing shareholders or employees, according to context—and being distinctive—by diverging from their peers. Analyzing a cross‐national sample of firms from 2004 to 2011, we identify combinations of engagement strategies, firm attributes, and contexts linked to high performance. Our findings highlight the multiple context‐dependent paths, which link stakeholder engagement to high firm performance. Managerial summary How do firms navigate pressures from shareholders and employees across different institutional environments? We develop a typology of stakeholder engagement strategies based on how firms in different countries strike a balance between conformity (i.e., prioritizing locally important stakeholders) and differentiation (i.e., prioritizing stakeholders that their local peers might neglect). Our findings show that the engagement strategies associated with high performance vary according to local institutional context and firm characteristics. In particular, by not merely prioritizing stakeholders who are already locally important, firms can use stakeholder engagement to differentiate themselves from their peers, and such engagement strategies are often linked to high performance.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 221 citations exist upstream.

References

1990Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance 1999Corporate Ownership Around the World 1997Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts 1995Institutions and organizations 2003Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis 2001Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective 1984Structural Inertia and Organizational Change 2000Investor protection and corporate governance

Cited by

2022Corporate social responsibility: A review of empirical research using Thomson Reuters Asset4 data 2022Corporate social counterpositioning: How attributes of social issues influence competitive response 2024The effect of ESG and CSR attitude on financial performance in Europe: A quantitative re-examination 2022Optimal Distinctiveness: On Being the Same and Different 2022Multilevel optimal distinctiveness: Examining the impact of within‐ and between‐organization distinctiveness of product design on market performance

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.