SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Coproduction during and after the COVID ‐19 Pandemic: Will It Last?
11 references·16 citing·48 second hop
Coproduction during and after the COVID ‐19 Pandemic: Will It Last? (2020)Coproduction during and after the COVID ‐…The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation (2019)The potential impacts of digi…Epidemics and Society : From the Black Death to the Present (2019)Epidemics and Society : From …A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process (2018)A systematic review of barrie…A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey (2014)A Systematic Review of Co-Cre…Wicked Problems (2013)Wicked ProblemsPUBLIC POLICY NETWORKS AND ‘WICKED PROBLEMS’: A NASCENT SOLUTION? (2011)PUBLIC POLICY NETWORKS AND ‘W…A Journal of the Plague Year (2006)A Journal of the Plague YearCrossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development (1996)Crossing the great divide: Co…Coproduction: Citizen Participation in Service Delivery (1980)Coproduction: Citizen Partici…Still Muddling, Not Yet Through (1979)Still Muddling, Not Yet Throu…Dilemmas in a general theory of planning (1973)Dilemmas in a general theory …Embedding co-production of nature-based solutions in urban governance: Emerging co-production capacities in three European cities (2023)Embedding co-production of na…What is the societal impact of university research? A policy-oriented review to map approaches, identify monitoring methods and success factors (2022)What is the societal impact o…The public sector and co‐creation in turbulent times: A systematic literature review on robust governance in the COVID‐19 emergency (2022)The public sector and co‐crea…The future of public sector accounting research. A polyphonic debate (2022)The future of public sector a…Increasing COVID-19 vaccination intentions: a field experiment on psychological ownership (2022)Increasing COVID-19 vaccinati…How to systematically analyze co‐production to inform future policies? Introducing 5Ws of co‐production (2022)How to systematically analyze…From recovery resilience to transformative resilience: How digital platforms reshape public service provision during and post COVID-19 (2022)From recovery resilience to t…Crowdsourcing and COVID ‐19: How Public Administrations Mobilize Crowds to Find Solutions to Problems Posed by the Pandemic (2022)Crowdsourcing and COVID ‐19: …COVID ‐19‐induced governance transformation: How external shocks may spur cross‐organizational collaboration and trust‐based management (2022)COVID ‐19‐induced governance …Co-production: A resource to guide co-producing research in the sport, exercise, and health sciences (2022)Co-production: A resource to …Government information disclosure and citizen coproduction during COVID ‐19 in China (2021)Government information disclo…Customer co-creation, COVID-19 and sustainable service outcomes (2021)Customer co-creation, COVID-1…A polycentric approach for pandemic governance: nested externalities and co-production challenges (2021)A polycentric approach for pa…A Comparative Analysis of Co-Production in Public Services (2021)A Comparative Analysis of Co-…Functional fragmentation in city hall and Twitter communication during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Atlanta, San Francisco, and Washington, DC (2020)Functional fragmentation in c…COVID-19: effective policymaking depends on trust in experts, politicians, and the public (2020)COVID-19: effective policymak…Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (1992)Economics, Organization and Management. (1993)Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization (1996)Bonds and Bridges: Social Capital and Poverty (2002)Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services (2007)Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction (2017)The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (1984)The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1985)Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation (2016)Wicked and less wicked problems: a typology and a contingency framework (2017)Wicked Problems in Public Policy (2023)Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. (1974)CONSUMERS AS COPRODUCERS OF PUBLIC SERVICES: SOME ECONOMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS (1981)Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Concept (1983)From Engagement to Co-production: The Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value (2012)Allocative efficiency vs. X-Efficiency (1966)The politics of crisis management : public leadership under pressure (2005)Policy Experimentation in China’s Economic Rise (2007)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)Building Theories from Case Study Research (1989)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1991)HYBRID MANAGER–PROFESSIONALS' IDENTITY WORK: THE MAINTENANCE AND HYBRIDIZATION OF MEDICAL PROFESSIONALISM IN MANAGERIAL CONTEXTS (2015)Hybrid professionalism and beyond: (New) Forms of public professionalism in changing organizational and societal contexts (2015)What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program (2017)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment? (2016)Transforming the Public Sector Into an Arena for Co-Creation: Barriers, Drivers, Benefits, and Ways Forward (2016)Diffusion of innovations. (2003)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)A systematic literature review of open innovation in the public sector: comparing barriers and governance strategies of digital and non-digital open innovation (2020)Fake news, social media and marketing: A systematic review (2020)COVID-19 and the New Normal of Organizations and Employees: An Overview (2021)Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation (2012)The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power (2019)Anticipatory innovation governance (2020)Responding to COVID-19: Community volunteerism and coproduction in China (2020)Emerging trends in digital transformation: a bibliometric analysis (2021)A Ladder Of Citizen Participation (1969)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1996)Epistemic Injustice (2007)Co-creation solutions and the three Co’s framework for applying Co-creation (2024)Navigating the Digital Frontier: Inherent Mechanisms, Challenges, and Strategies for Sports Consumption Upgrade in the Digital Economy (2024)What does ‘co‐production’ look like for food system transformation? Mapping the evidence across Transforming UK Food Systems ( TUKFS ) projects (2024)Why We Disagree about Climate Change (2009)An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance (2011)Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1973Dilemmas in a general theory of planning16,321 cited
  • 1996Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development2,656 cited
  • 2014A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey2,330 cited
  • 1979Still Muddling, Not Yet Through1,640 cited
  • 2013Wicked Problems1,513 cited
  • 1980Coproduction: Citizen Participation in Service Delivery647 cited
  • 2018A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process382 cited
  • 2019The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation356 cited
  • 2011PUBLIC POLICY NETWORKS AND ‘WICKED PROBLEMS’: A NASCENT SOLUTION?336 cited
  • 2006A Journal of the Plague Year171 cited
  • 2019Epidemics and Society : From the Black Death to the Present121 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Co-production: A resource to guide co-producing research in the sport, exercise, and health sciences303 cited
  • 2020COVID-19: effective policymaking depends on trust in experts, politicians, and the public216 cited
  • 2022From recovery resilience to transformative resilience: How digital platforms reshape public service provision during and post COVID-19124 cited
  • 2022

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The future of public sector accounting research. A polyphonic debate
82 cited
  • 2022The public sector and co‐creation in turbulent times: A systematic literature review on robust governance in the COVID‐19 emergency81 cited
  • 2020Functional fragmentation in city hall and Twitter communication during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Atlanta, San Francisco, and Washington, DC66 cited
  • 2021A polycentric approach for pandemic governance: nested externalities and co-production challenges66 cited
  • 2023Embedding co-production of nature-based solutions in urban governance: Emerging co-production capacities in three European cities58 cited
  • 2021Government information disclosure and citizen coproduction during COVID ‐19 in China50 cited
  • 2022What is the societal impact of university research? A policy-oriented review to map approaches, identify monitoring methods and success factors45 cited
  • 2022COVID ‐19‐induced governance transformation: How external shocks may spur cross‐organizational collaboration and trust‐based management41 cited
  • 2022Crowdsourcing and COVID ‐19: How Public Administrations Mobilize Crowds to Find Solutions to Problems Posed by the Pandemic34 cited
  • 2021A Comparative Analysis of Co-Production in Public Services32 cited
  • 2022How to systematically analyze co‐production to inform future policies? Introducing 5Ws of co‐production32 cited
  • 2021Customer co-creation, COVID-19 and sustainable service outcomes28 cited
  • 2022Increasing COVID-19 vaccination intentions: a field experiment on psychological ownership27 cited