SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes: Using pseudo IPD created from aggregate data to adjust for baseline imbalance and assess treatment‐by‐baseline modification
16 references·2 citing·46 second hop
Meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes: Using pseudo IPD created from aggregate data to adjust for baseline imbalance and assess treatment‐by‐baseline modification (2020)Meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes: Usi…Individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine interactions between treatment effect and participant‐level covariates: Statistical recommendations for conduct and planning (2020)Individual participant data m…Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a systematic review (2018)Dealing with missing standard…Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ (2016)Meta-analysis using individua…Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology (2015)Get real in individual partic…Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves (2012)Enhanced secondary analysis o…Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data (2010)Random effects meta-analysis …Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting (2010)Meta-analysis of individual p…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data (2007)Meta‐analysis of continuous o…A systematic review identifies a lack of standardization in methods for handling missing variance data (2006)A systematic review identifie…Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice (2005)Meta-analysis of individual p…To IPD or not to IPD? (2002)To IPD or not to IPD?Individual patient‐ versus group‐level data meta‐regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head (2002)Individual patient‐ versus gr…A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis (2002)A comparison of summary patie…A multilevel model framework for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes (2000)A multilevel model framework …Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…On the Appropriateness of Fixed Correlation Assumptions in Repeated-Measures Meta-Analysis: A Monte Carlo Assessment (2025)On the Appropriateness of Fix…MA ‐cont:pre/post effect size: An interactive tool for the meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes using R Shiny (2022)MA ‐cont:pre/post effect size…Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints (1998)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Survival Analysis for Economic Evaluations Alongside Clinical Trials—Extrapolation with Patient-Level Data (2013)Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect (2019)IPDfromKM: reconstruct individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves (2021)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Qstatistics (2011)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data (2015)Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis (2019)Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math (2020)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods (1999)Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Multiple Treatment Comparisons: An Introduction to Mixed Treatment Comparisons (2008)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3 (2013)Methods for Population-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in Health Technology Appraisal (2017)Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update (2006)Seriously misleading results using inverse of Freeman‐Tukey double arcsine transformation in meta‐analysis of single proportions (2019)Prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychological distress among populations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)The prevalence of loneliness across 113 countries: systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Narrowing the transmission gap: A synthesis of three decades of research on intergenerational transmission of attachment. (2015)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)A comparison of seven random‐effects models for meta‐analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio (2018)An extended mixed‐effects framework for meta‐analysis (2019)Most published meta-regression analyses based on aggregate data suffer from methodological pitfalls: a meta-epidemiological study (2021)Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample (2005)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range (2014)Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from order statistics and sample size in meta-analysis (2021)Effects of non-pharmacological interventions on loneliness among community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression (2023)Ten circumstances and solutions for finding the sample mean and standard deviation for meta-analysis (2023)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 2010Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,176 cited
  • 2012Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves2,553 cited
  • 2010Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting1,701 cited
  • 2010Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data755 cited
  • 2002To IPD or not to IPD?571 cited
  • 2005Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice557 cited
  • 2016Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ537 cited
  • 2002Individual patient‐ versus group‐level data meta‐regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head469 cited
  • 2018Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a systematic review426 cited
  • 2002A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis394 cited
  • 2015Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology348 cited
  • 2006A systematic review identifies a lack of standardization in methods for handling missing variance data296 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2007Meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data280 cited
  • 2000A multilevel model framework for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes265 cited
  • 2020Individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine interactions between treatment effect and participant‐level covariates: Statistical recommendations for conduct and planning177 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022MA ‐cont:pre/post effect size: An interactive tool for the meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes using R Shiny21 cited
    • 2025On the Appropriateness of Fixed Correlation Assumptions in Repeated-Measures Meta-Analysis: A Monte Carlo Assessment12 cited