SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
International authorship and collaboration across bioRxiv preprints
16 references·6 citing·47 second hop
International authorship and collaboration across bioRxiv preprints (2020)International authorship and collaboratio…Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints (2019)Tracking the popularity and o…Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article (2019)Releasing a preprint is assoc…On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective (2019)On the value of preprints: An…bioRxiv: the preprint server for biology (2019)bioRxiv: the preprint server …Preprints for the life sciences (2016)Preprints for the life scienc…The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The journal coverage of Web o…Bias in peer review (2012)Bias in peer reviewIs correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position (2010)Is correspondence reflected i…The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)The Increasing Dominance of T…Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach (2007)Coverage analysis of Scopus: …Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance (2006)Effect of Blinded Peer Review…Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases (2006)Benchmarking scientific outpu…Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship (2006)Analysing Scientific Networks…Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981–1999 (2005)Scientific teams and institut…Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Scie…The Order of Authorship: Who's on First? (1990)The Order of Authorship: Who'…Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science (2024)Recommendations for accelerat…Evaluation of Publication of COVID-19–Related Articles Initially Presented as Preprints (2022)Evaluation of Publication of …A guide to preprinting for early-career researchers (2022)A guide to preprinting for ea…Preprints: Their Evolving Role in Science Communication (2021)Preprints: Their Evolving Rol…Preprinting is positively associated with early career researcher status in ecology and evolution (2021)Preprinting is positively ass…Attitudes and practices of open data, preprinting, and peer-review—A cross sectional study on Croatian scientists (2021)Attitudes and practices of op…Little Science, Big Science (1963)What is research collaboration? (1997)Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration (2004)Diaspora and Transnationalism : Concepts, Theories and Methods (2010)Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks (2010)Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research (2020)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Market value and patent citations (2005)Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups (2010)Temperature Shocks and Economic Growth: Evidence from the Last Half Century (2012)The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market* (2017)Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)Science as Social Knowledge (1990)A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (1994)Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)US and Non-US Submissions (1998)Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial (2011)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Measuring the efficiency of decision making units (1978)An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (1983)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature (2007)Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience (2009)Moral Hazard in Teams (1982)Endogenous Technological Change (1989)Endogenous Technological Change (1990)Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe (2010)Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900 (2014)Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators (2017)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin (1994)Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers (2003)Top-cited Articles in Chemical Engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded: A Bibliometric Analysis (2012)Eco-innovation in the transition to a circular economy: An analytical literature review (2017)Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators (2019)What Large-Scale Publication and Citation Data Tell Us About International Research Collaboration in Europe: Changing National Patterns in Global Contexts (2020)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Web of Science and Scopus language coverage (2019)Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019 (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis5,251 cited
  • 2007The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge3,605 cited
  • 2012Bias in peer review997 cited
  • 2005Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research979 cited
  • 2006Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship821 cited
  • 2005Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981–1999550 cited
  • 2006Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases498 cited
  • 2007Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach380 cited
  • 1990The Order of Authorship: Who's on First?256 cited
  • 2006Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance250 cited
  • 2019Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints196 cited
  • 2019Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article186 cited
  • 2019On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective184 cited
  • 2016Preprints for the life sciences178 cited
  • 2010Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

159 cited
  • 2019bioRxiv: the preprint server for biology140 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science36 cited
    • 2021Preprints: Their Evolving Role in Science Communication30 cited
    • 2021Attitudes and practices of open data, preprinting, and peer-review—A cross sectional study on Croatian scientists23 cited
    • 2021Preprinting is positively associated with early career researcher status in ecology and evolution13 cited
    • 2022A guide to preprinting for early-career researchers10 cited
    • 2022Evaluation of Publication of COVID-19–Related Articles Initially Presented as Preprints9 cited