SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Changing how we evaluate research is difficult, but not impossible
7 references·16 citing·47 second hop
Changing how we evaluate research is difficult, but not impossible (2020)Changing how we evaluate research is diff…Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations (2020)Why we publish where we do: F…Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)Use of the Journal Impact Fac…The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)The evaluation of scholarship…An Inclusive Academy (2018)An Inclusive Academy“Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence (2017)“Excellence R Us”: university…Fewer numbers, better science (2016)Fewer numbers, better scienceDecoupling of the minority PhD talent pool and assistant professor hiring in medical school basic science departments in the US (2016)Decoupling of the minority Ph…False authorship: an explorative case study around an AI-generated article published under my name (2025)False authorship: an explorat…Research Integrity definitions and challenges (2024)Research Integrity definition…Practicing responsible research assessment: Qualitative study of faculty hiring, promotion, and tenure assessments in the United States (2024)Practicing responsible resear…Achieving Global Open Access (2024)Achieving Global Open AccessLittle transparency and equity in scientific awards for early- and mid-career researchers in ecology and evolution (2023)Little transparency and equit…The role of collegiality in academic review, promotion, and tenure (2022)The role of collegiality in a…Research integrity in clinical trials: innocent errors and spin versus scientific misconduct (2022)Research integrity in clinica…Preprints (2022)PreprintsPerceived publication pressure and research misconduct: should we be too bothered with a causal relationship? (2022)Perceived publication pressur…Identifying science in the news: An assessment of the precision and recall of Altmetric.com news mention data (2022)Identifying science in the ne…Towards inclusive funding practices for early career researchers (2021)Towards inclusive funding pra…The Impacts of Incentives for International Publications on Research Cultures in Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences (2021)The Impacts of Incentives for…Research assessments should recognize responsible research practices — Narrative review of a lively debate and promising developments (2021)Research assessments should r…Preprints: Their Evolving Role in Science Communication (2021)Preprints: Their Evolving Rol…Creating SPACE to evolve academic assessment (2021)Creating SPACE to evolve acad…Article-Level Metrics (2021)Article-Level MetricsThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Interpreting Bibliometric Data (2021)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)Indicators as judgment devices: An empirical study of citizen bibliometrics in research evaluation (2017)Thinking with indicators. Exploring the epistemic impacts of academic performance indicators in the life sciences (2017)Protective or connective professionalism? How connected professionals can (still) act as autonomous and authoritative experts (2020)Science and Engineering Indicators 1998 (1998)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards (2011)The Influence of Affirming Kindness and Community on Broadening Participation in STEM Career Pathways (2018)Nudging Toward Diversity: Applying Behavioral Design to Faculty Hiring (2020)Patching the Leaks: Revitalizing and Reimagining the STEM Pipeline (2020)The Scholarship of Engagement (1996)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents? (2019)Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s “Mirror Journal” system (2021)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities (2020)Gendered citation practices in the field of communication (2021)Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. (1985)Evaluations of Self and Others: Self-Enhancement Biases in Social Judgments (1986)The theory of planned behavior (1991)How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: the case of economists (2020)Open is not forever: A study of vanished open access journals (2021)Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. (1987)The Forms of Capital (2002)Questioning Scientific Publications: Understanding how Indonesian Scholars Perceive the Obligation to Publish and its Ethical Practices (2023)Twenty years of Chinese social sciences towards internationalization (1998–2017): a knowledge sources perspective (2023)The internationalization of Chinese social sciences research: publication, collaboration, and citation patterns in economics, education, and political science (2024)The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (2025)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Downstream retraction of preprinted research in the life and medical sciences (2022)Science in motion: A qualitative analysis of journalists’ use and perception of preprints (2022)Characterization of Comments About bioRxiv and medRxiv Preprints (2023)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)The Elevator Effect (2023)Committees with implicit biases promote fewer women when they do not believe gender bias exists (2019)Examining racism in health services research: A disciplinary self‐critique (2020)Turning Chutes into Ladders for Women Faculty: A Review and Roadmap for Equity in Academia (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations357 cited
  • 2018The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future343 cited
  • 2017“Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence266 cited
  • 2020Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations243 cited
  • 2016Decoupling of the minority PhD talent pool and assistant professor hiring in medical school basic science departments in the US172 cited
  • 2018An Inclusive Academy150 cited
  • 2016Fewer numbers, better science149 cited

Cited by

  • 2021The Impacts of Incentives for International Publications on Research Cultures in Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences64 cited
  • 2022The role of collegiality in academic review, promotion, and tenure57 cited
  • 2022Preprints37 cited
  • 2021Article-Level Metrics34 cited
  • 2021Preprints: Their Evolving Role in Science Communication30 cited
  • 2021Creating SPACE to evolve academic assessment27 cited
  • 2024Research Integrity definitions and challenges27 cited
  • 2024Practicing responsible research assessment: Qualitative study of faculty hiring, promotion, and tenure assessments in the United States

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

26 cited
  • 2025False authorship: an explorative case study around an AI-generated article published under my name25 cited
  • 2022Research integrity in clinical trials: innocent errors and spin versus scientific misconduct24 cited
  • 2022Identifying science in the news: An assessment of the precision and recall of Altmetric.com news mention data23 cited
  • 2021Towards inclusive funding practices for early career researchers21 cited
  • 2021Research assessments should recognize responsible research practices — Narrative review of a lively debate and promising developments17 cited
  • 2024Achieving Global Open Access15 cited
  • 2023Little transparency and equity in scientific awards for early- and mid-career researchers in ecology and evolution14 cited
  • 2022Perceived publication pressure and research misconduct: should we be too bothered with a causal relationship?14 cited