SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Toward a classification of Spanish scholarly journals in social sciences and humanities considering their impact and visibility
16 references·2 citing·46 second hop
Toward a classification of Spanish scholarly journals in social sciences and humanities considering their impact and visibility (2020)Toward a classification of Spanish schola…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University (2014)Accountability in context: ef…The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000 (2013)The validation of (advanced) …A new methodology for constructing a publication‐level classification system of science (2012)A new methodology for constru…Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)Impact factor: outdated artef…The h‐index: a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010)The h‐index: a broad review o…The Four Literatures of Social Science (2006)The Four Literatures of Socia…Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Bibliometric monitoring of re…Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases (2006)Benchmarking scientific outpu…A Hirsch-type index for journals (2006)A Hirsch-type index for journ…Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Scie…Early citation counts correlate with accumulated impact (2005)Early citation counts correla…Self‐citation and self‐reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication (2003)Self‐citation and self‐refere…Towards Research Performance in the Humanities. (2002)Towards Research Performance …A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences (1999)A bibliometric study of refer…Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980-1989) (1998)Patterns of self-citation acr…Bibliometric analysis of Asian ‘language and linguistics’ research: A case of 13 countries (2023)Bibliometric analysis of Asia…Impact and visibility of Norwegian, Finnish and Spanish journals in the fields of humanities (2021)Impact and visibility of Norw…Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2005)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)Descriptions of Sampling Practices Within Five Approaches to Qualitative Research in Education and the Health Sciences (2014)The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power (2014)Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers (2019)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks (2010)Identifying emerging topics in science and technology (2014)Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus (2016)Emerging trends and new developments in information science: a document co-citation analysis (2009–2016) (2018)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature (2007)A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator (2010)Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective (2013)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (1964)Language and Symbolic Power. (1992)Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications (2005)Men Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-citation across Fields and over Time (2017)Mapping the Literature on Academic Publishing: A Bibliometric Analysis on WOS (2023)Measuring the efficiency of decision making units (1978)An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (1983)Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience (2009)The New Production of Knowledge (1994)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. (1995)The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities (2006)The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators (2013)The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013) (2016)Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities (2006)Extending citation analysis to non-source items (2006)The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible (2006)Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis (2007)What do we know about the h index? (2007)Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Web of Science and Scopus language coverage (2019)Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019 (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2005Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research979 cited
  • 2006Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review786 cited
  • 2006A Hirsch-type index for journals671 cited
  • 2012A new methodology for constructing a publication‐level classification system of science663 cited
  • 2006Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases498 cited
  • 2011Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?370 cited
  • 2006The Four Literatures of Social Science369 cited
  • 2003Self‐citation and self‐reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication303 cited
  • 1999A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences279 cited
  • 2014Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University184 cited
  • 2005Early citation counts correlate with accumulated impact162 cited
  • 1998Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980-1989)150 cited
  • 2013The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

118 cited
  • 2002Towards Research Performance in the Humanities.113 cited
  • 2010The h‐index: a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator112 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Impact and visibility of Norwegian, Finnish and Spanish journals in the fields of humanities14 cited
    • 2023Bibliometric analysis of Asian ‘language and linguistics’ research: A case of 13 countries13 cited