Exploring built environment impacts on transit use – an updated meta-analysis

Laura Aston · Graham Currie · Alexa Delbosc · Md. Kamruzzaman · David Teller

103 citations0/0 files storedTransport Reviews

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Urban Transport and Accessibility Transportation Planning and Optimization Urban Design and Spatial Analysis

Abstract

The built environment (BE) is widely accepted to influence transit use (TU). Evidence to date suggests the relationship is dependent on many factors which can be difficult to account for in quantitative studies. This creates barriers to transferring research into practice. Considering many studies together can be useful for accounting for more of the factors impacting transit use. Yet, meta-analysis of research measuring these influences was last undertaken in 2010 based on 18 studies. Since then 90 new quantitative studies have been published. These recent studies use improved methodologies and are conducted in more diverse geographies. This paper reports an improved and updated meta-analysis of built environment impacts on transit use. It compares elasticity estimates from research published pre-and post-2010 and explores the impact of new methods and a more diverse geographical representation on findings. Updated meta-elasticities range from <0.01 to 0.26; a similar range to the 2010 study. However, at the individual indicator levels, more recent results are different. Elasticities for urban density, including population, employment and commercial density, have increased significantly in studies published since 2010, as did that of land use mix. However, measures of local access, design and jobs-housing balance decreased in post-2010 studies. These results confirm the small but imprecise relationship between the BE and TU. Results also suggest that while the range of elasticity impacts is relatively consistent, new study methodologies, notably those that control for regional accessibility and self-selection, and the increasing geographical diversity in study applications, is acting to change BE-TU findings at the indicator level. Research setting and context are important to consider when using empirical results to design BE strategies to promote transit use.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 103 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Introduction to Meta‐Analysis 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation 2001Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2010A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis 2010Travel and the Built Environment 1997Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design 1988Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand 2001Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis

Cited by

2023Using machine-learning models to understand nonlinear relationships between land use and travel 2023Exploring nonlinear and collective influences of regional and local built environment characteristics on travel distances by mode 2024Built environment influences commute mode choice in a global south megacity context: Insights from explainable machine learning approach 2022Investigating the impacts of transit-oriented development on transport-related CO2 emissions 2021On bus ridership and frequency

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.