SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A retrospective study investigating requests for self-citation during open peer review in a general medicine journal
5 references·5 citing·46 second hop
A retrospective study investigating requests for self-citation during open peer review in a general medicine journal (2020)A retrospective study investigating reque…The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)The limitations to our unders…Reviewer-coerced citation: case report, update on journal policy and suggestions for future prevention (2019)Reviewer-coerced citation: ca…Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: A cross-sectional study (2014)Potentially coercive self-cit…Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial (2010)Effect on peer review of tell…Perceptions of Ethical Problems with Scientific Journal Peer Review: An Exploratory Study (2008)Perceptions of Ethical Proble…Does the disconnect between the peer-reviewed label and reality explain the peer review crisis, and can open peer review or preprints resolve it? A narrative review (2025)Does the disconnect between t…Key Guidelines for Responding to Reviewers (2024)Key Guidelines for Responding…Drivers of citations in social pharmacy and practice research articles (2024)Drivers of citations in socia…Self-citation behavior within the health allied professions’ scientific sector in Italy: a bibliometric analysis (2022)Self-citation behavior within…Reglas y consejos para ser un buen revisor por pares de manuscritos científicos (2022)Reglas y consejos para ser un…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing (2012)How prevalent is academic misconduct in management research? (2017)The effects of citation-based research evaluation schemes on self-citation behavior (2021)Opening up BMJ peer review (1999)The politics of publication (2003)Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial (2004)Scientific peer review (2011)Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers (2012)Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective (2017)Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Peer review in health sciences (2002)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)A generalized view of self-citation: Direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation (2014)Citations and Gamed Metrics: Academic Integrity Lost (2021)Detecting anomalous referencing patterns in PubMed papers suggestive of author-centric reference list manipulation (2022)From Integrity to Inflation: Ethical and Unethical Citation Practices in Academic Publishing (2025)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots (2023)The emergent role of artificial intelligence, natural learning processing, and large language models in higher education and research (2023)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review (2017)Peer review in scientific publishing: Current practice, guidelines, relevancy, and way forward (2023)Does self-citation pay? (2007)Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions (2017)Content Analysis in Consumer Research (1977)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Assessing methodological quality of systematic reviews with meta-analysis about clinical pharmacy services: A sensitivity analysis of AMSTAR-2 (2024)The International Collaboration of Pharmacy Journal Editors (ICPJE) formally constituted to foster quality around clinical and social pharmacy practice research publications (2024)The International Collaboration of Pharmacy Journal Editors (ICPJE) formally constituted to foster quality around clinical and social pharmacy practice research publications* (2024)Publication practices and responsible authorship: a review article (2017)From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing (2023)Death of a reviewer or death of peer review integrity? the challenges of using AI tools in peer reviewing and the need to go beyond publishing policies (2024)Scientific parallels of sleep physiology in the Qur’anic narrative of the Companions of the Cave “the Cave Sleepers” (2025)Bias in peer review (2012)Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Paying peer reviewers: benefits, risks, and challenges (2026)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020The limitations to our understanding of peer review436 cited
  • 2010Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial163 cited
  • 2008Perceptions of Ethical Problems with Scientific Journal Peer Review: An Exploratory Study135 cited
  • 2014Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: A cross-sectional study65 cited
  • 2019Reviewer-coerced citation: case report, update on journal policy and suggestions for future prevention36 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Key Guidelines for Responding to Reviewers16 cited
  • 2024Drivers of citations in social pharmacy and practice research articles14 cited
  • 2022Reglas y consejos para ser un buen revisor por pares de manuscritos científicos13 cited
  • 2022Self-citation behavior within the health allied professions’ scientific sector in Italy: a bibliometric analysis6 cited
  • 2025Does the disconnect between the peer-reviewed label and reality explain the peer review crisis, and can open peer review or preprints resolve it? A narrative review5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work