Exploring Risk and Benefit Factors Affecting User Adoption Intention of Fintech in Indonesia

Fannisa Rahma Haqqi · Amalia Suzianti

26 citations0/0 files storedAsia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering (APCoRISE)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Technology Adoption and User Behaviour FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior

Abstract

The presence of Fintech as an innovative and disruptive financial service can improve the efficiency and scope of financial services through the application of technology. Fintech is considered to have various benefits. However, based on survey conducted by DailySocial and Otoritas Jasa Keuangan finds that the Fintech adoption rate in Indonesia is still relatively low at around 58.1%, this is in line with a penetration level of Fintech in Asia which Indonesia usage level still in 5% compared to China, Hong Kong, and India. In determining Fintech adoption, users tend to do rational calculations by comparing the perceived benefits and risks and will decide to adopt them when the perceived benefits are greater than the risks received. According to some studies, trust can be mediated to reduce some level of risk, thus this study will also include trust variables in the risk-benefit framework to determine user adoption intention on Fintech services in Indonesia. Based on data collected from 100 Fintech users, this study initially investigated whether perceived benefits and risks significantly impacted Fintech adoption intention. Partial Least Square (PLS-SEM) method is used to estimate the relationship between constructs. As a resulting trust, economic benefit and convenience are proven to significantly influence the user to adopt Fintech. While privacy awareness, financial risk, and legal risk are significantly affected by user trust. The hypothesis testing indicates that security risk has the biggest negative effect and convenience has the biggest positive effect on Fintech adoption intention.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

References

1981Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error 2011PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet 1998Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust 2000Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice 2007A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents 1993Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization 1982Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory 2008Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit

Cited by

2022The Roles of Personality Traits, AI Anxiety, and Demographic Factors in Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence 2022Linking Fintech Payment Services and Customer Loyalty Intention in the Hospitality Industry: The Mediating Role of Customer Experience and Attitude 2024BARRIERS IN ADOPTION OF FINTECH BY STREET VENDORS AND HAWKERS IN INDIA USING INTERPRETIVE STRUCTURAL MODELING 2024Developing a financial technology (FinTech) adoption scale: A validity and reliability study

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.