Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science

12 references·16 citing·37 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1959The Logic of Scientific Discovery.7,499 cited
1962On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications.4,030 cited
1959The logic of scientific discovery1,915 cited
2011Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions349 cited
2020Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias332 cited
2001Asking the gatekeepers: A national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world.252 cited
2012Repeatability and Reproducibility of Decisions by Latent Fingerprint Examiners180 cited
2009Invalid Forensic Science Testimony and Wrongful Convictions133 cited
2016A hierarchy of expert performance.116 cited
2005More than Zero: Accounting for Error in Latent Fingerprint Identification106 cited
2009The testimony of forensic identification science: What expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear.102 cited
2018“Cannot Decide”: The Fine Line Between Appropriate Inconclusive Determinations Versus Unjustifiably Deciding Not To Decide74 cited

Cited by

2022Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners46 cited
2021The distinction between discriminability and reliability in forensic science

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

42 cited

2021Forensic science and the principle of excluded middle: “Inconclusive” decisions and the structure of error rate studies38 cited

2021Inconclusives and error rates in forensic science: a signal detection theory approach36 cited

2023The scientific reinvention of forensic science35 cited

2023The most consistent finding in forensic science is inconsistency31 cited

2022Inconclusives, Errors, and Error Rates in Forensic Firearms Analysis:Three Statistical Perspectives30 cited

2022Planning, design and logistics of a decision analysis study: The FBI/Ames study involving forensic firearms examiners28 cited

2020Biasability and reliability of expert forensic document examiners25 cited

2023Validity of forensic cartridge-case comparisons24 cited

2023Human Factors in Forensic Science20 cited

2024Inconclusive decisions and error rates in forensic science17 cited

2023Repeatability and reproducibility of comparison decisions by firearms examiners16 cited

2024Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons15 cited

2022Inconclusives in firearm error rate studies are not ‘a pass’14 cited

2023Scientific guidelines for evaluating the validity of forensic feature-comparison methods13 cited