SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessing context suitability (generalizability, external validity, applicability or transferability) of findings in evidence syntheses in healthcare—An integrative review of methodological guidance
13 references·3 citing·45 second hop
Assessing context suitability (generalizability, external validity, applicability or transferability) of findings in evidence syntheses in healthcare—An integrative review of methodological guidance (2020)Assessing context suitability (generaliza…The TRANSFER Approach for assessing the transferability of systematic review findings (2020)The TRANSFER Approach for ass…What Synthesis Methodology Should I Use? A Review and Analysis of Approaches to Research Synthesis. (2016)What Synthesis Methodology Sh…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …Assessing the applicability of findings in systematic reviews of complex interventions can enhance the utility of reviews for decision making (2013)Assessing the applicability o…Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews (2012)Methods Guide for Medical Tes…Using qualitative synthesis to explore heterogeneity of complex interventions (2011)Using qualitative synthesis t…GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating t…Applicability and generalisability of the results of systematic reviews to public health practice and policy: a systematic review (2010)Applicability and generalisab…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme (2006)Guidance on the conduct of na…The integrative review: updated methodology (2005)The integrative review: updat…The Logic of Generalization From Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Impact Evaluations (2024)The Logic of Generalization F…Consensus on the definition and assessment of external validity of randomized controlled trials: A Delphi study (2023)Consensus on the definition a…Identification of tools used to assess the external validity of randomized controlled trials in reviews: a systematic review of measurement properties (2022)Identification of tools used …Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews (2009)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies (2014)External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Qualitative research and evaluation methods (1980)Qualitative Data Analysis (2008)Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem (2008)Integrative review: what is it? How to do it? (2010)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)Big Boys Don’t Cry: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of Male Sexual Victimization (2018)Why should I share knowledge with others? A review-based framework on events leading to knowledge hiding (2020)“The potential of social media in health promotion beyond creating awareness: an integrative review” (2022)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Better Information for Better Health Care: The Evidence-based Practice Center Program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2005)When Is Measuring Sensitivity and Specificity Sufficient To Evaluate a Diagnostic Test, and When Do We Need Randomized Trials? (2006)AHRQ Series Paper 5: Grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions—Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Effective Health-Care Program (2009)Assessing Personalized Medicines in Australia (2012)Chapter 1: Introduction to the Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews (2012)Psychometric Properties of the Internet Addiction Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2018)Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada (2015)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)A research and development agenda for systematic reviews that ask complex questions about complex interventions (2013)Clinical Decision Analysis using Decision Tree (2014)Knowledge synthesis methods for integrating qualitative and quantitative data: a scoping review reveals poor operationalization of the methodological steps (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2005The integrative review: updated methodology10,189 cited
  • 2006Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme2,066 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness1,838 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 2016What Synthesis Methodology Should I Use? A Review and Analysis of Approaches to Research Synthesis.215 cited
  • 2012Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews89 cited
  • 2013Assessing the applicability of findings in systematic reviews of complex interventions can enhance the utility of reviews for decision making82 cited
  • 2011Using qualitative synthesis to explore heterogeneity of complex interventions78 cited
  • 2020The TRANSFER Approach for assessing the transferability of systematic review findings64 cited
  • 2010Applicability and generalisability of the results of systematic reviews to public health practice and policy: a systematic review53 cited

Cited by

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2022Identification of tools used to assess the external validity of randomized controlled trials in reviews: a systematic review of measurement properties24 cited
  • 2023Consensus on the definition and assessment of external validity of randomized controlled trials: A Delphi study13 cited
  • 2024The Logic of Generalization From Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Impact Evaluations10 cited