Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Dealing with inappropriate-, low-quality-, and other forms of challenging peer review, including hostile referees and inflammatory or confusing critiques: Prevention and treatment

7 references·4 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2007AMA manual of style: a guide for authors and editors330 cited
2019Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM197 cited
2015Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors161 cited
2017Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers?80 cited
2009Tattered Threads64 cited
2008How to Write and Illustrate Scientific Papers34 cited
2015How to Review a Manuscript12 cited

Cited by

2023Applied linguistics journal editor perspectives: Research ethics and academic publishing13 cited
2021Peer review experiences of academic chemists in Ph.D. granting institutions in the United States7 cited
2025Beyond the Review: The Editorial Duty to Uphold Professional Conduct5 cited
2023Peer review: Problematic or promising?3 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work