SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Safeguarding anaesthesia research from spin
9 references·1 citing·44 second hop
Safeguarding anaesthesia research from spin (2020)Safeguarding anaesthesia research from sp…The SSSPIN study—spin in studies of spin: meta-research analysis (2019)The SSSPIN study—spin in stud…Level and Prevalence of Spin in Published Cardiovascular Randomized Clinical Trial Reports With Statistically Nonsignificant Primary Outcomes (2019)Level and Prevalence of Spin …Independent discussion sections for improving inferential reproducibility in published research (2019)Independent discussion sectio…Presence of ‘spin’ in the abstracts and titles of anaesthesiology randomised controlled trials (2018)Presence of ‘spin’ in the abs…It's All How You “Spin” It (2017)It's All How You “Spin” ItPublication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention (2014)Publication and other reporti…Overinterpretation and Misreporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Evidence of “Spin” (2013)Overinterpretation and Misrep…Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Reporting and Interpretation …"Spin" in scientific writing: scientific mischief and legal jeopardy. (2007)"Spin" in scientific writing:…Spin and fragility in randomised controlled trials in the anaesthesia literature: a systematic review (2023)Spin and fragility in randomi…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Does Cultural Competency Training of Health Professionals Improve Patient Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm for Future Research (2010)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015 (2016)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Top 10 Replicated Findings From Behavioral Genetics (2016)CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials (2018)Sample size evolution in neuroimaging research: An evaluation of highly-cited studies (1990–2012) and of latest practices (2017–2018) in high-impact journals (2020)The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Some Improvements after 10 Years of STARD (2014)Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention (2015)Pitfalls of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Imaging Research (2015)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial (2014)Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture (2019)Why blacklists are not reliable: A theoretical framework (2020)Randomized controlled trials: not always the “gold standard” for evidence in obstetrics and gynecology (2023)CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Abstracts of published randomized controlled trials in Endodontics: reporting quality and spin (2020)Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to the treatment of proximal humeral fractures (2021)Evaluation of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of superior capsular reconstruction (2022)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Fraud and retraction in perioperative medicine publications: what we learned and what can be implemented to prevent future recurrence (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Peer Review Matters: Research Quality and the Public Trust (2020)The presence and characteristics of ‘spin’ among randomized controlled trial abstracts in orthodontics (2021)Ten simple rules for good research practice (2022)Belief beyond the evidence: using the proposed effect of breakfast on obesity to show 2 practices that distort scientific evidence (2013)‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review (2017)Abstracts for reports of randomized trials of COVID-19 interventions had low quality and high spin (2021)Narrative bias (“spin”) is common in randomised trials and systematic reviews of cannabinoids for pain (2024)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Data Interpretation in Analgesic Clinical Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Primary Analyses: An ACTTION Systematic Review (2014)Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Primary Outcomes Published in High-impact Surgical Journals (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes828 cited
  • 2014Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention471 cited
  • 2013Overinterpretation and Misreporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Evidence of “Spin”158 cited
  • 2019Level and Prevalence of Spin in Published Cardiovascular Randomized Clinical Trial Reports With Statistically Nonsignificant Primary Outcomes94 cited
  • 2007"Spin" in scientific writing: scientific mischief and legal jeopardy.82 cited
  • 2018Presence of ‘spin’ in the abstracts and titles of anaesthesiology randomised controlled trials48 cited
  • 2017It's All How You “Spin” It34 cited
  • 2019Independent discussion sections for improving inferential reproducibility in published research31 cited
  • 2019The SSSPIN study—spin in studies of spin: meta-research analysis30 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Spin and fragility in randomised controlled trials in the anaesthesia literature: a systematic review20 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work