Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Destabilization and Consolidation: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Validating the Dual Characteristics of Technology

16 references·16 citing·45 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1991Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning21,910 cited
1997Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy15,265 cited
1934The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle7,610 cited
1982Technological paradigms and technological trajectories6,692 cited
1943Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy.6,530 cited
1986Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments6,124 cited
1983The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization.4,030 cited
2004THE ANTECEDENTS, CONSEQUENCES, AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY.3,932 cited
2001The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools3,537 cited
1978Patterns of Industrial Innovation3,340 cited
1985Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction2,794 cited
2009The Nature of Technology: What it Is and How it Evolves2,046 cited
1999Flexibility Versus Efficiency? A Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System1,560 cited
2013Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact1,477 cited
1994American universities and technical advance in industry

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1,429 cited

2009Organizational Path Dependence: Opening the Black Box1,261 cited

Cited by

2023What Types of Novelty Are Most Disruptive?53 cited
2022Metrics and mechanisms: Measuring the unmeasurable in the science of science39 cited
2023Quantifying revolutionary discoveries: Evidence from Nobel prize-winning papers36 cited
2023From consolidation to disruption: A novel way to measure the impact of scientists and identify laureates35 cited
2021Do-It-Yourself or Do-It-Together: How digital technologies affect creating alone or with others?27 cited
2021A proposal to revise the disruption index27 cited
2023The association between prior knowledge and the disruption of an article24 cited
2023Rescaling the disruption index reveals the universality of disruption distributions in science24 cited
2023Effect of the topic-combination novelty on the disruption and impact of scientific articles: Evidence from PubMed23 cited
2024The prominent and heterogeneous gender disparities in scientific novelty: Evidence from biomedical doctoral theses22 cited
2023Unveiling the impact and dual innovation of funded research21 cited
2024Content-based quality evaluation of scientific papers using coarse feature and knowledge entity network17 cited
2023Divide and conquer: Relating patent quality and value in a conceptual framework based on a systematic review16 cited
2024Quantifying the degree of scientific innovation breakthrough: Considering knowledge trajectory change and impact16 cited
2024Does science disrupt technology? Examining science intensity, novelty, and recency through patent-paper citations in the pharmaceutical field15 cited
2024Fueling a net-zero future: The influence of government-funded research on climate change mitigation inventions12 cited