SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Forensic Footwear Reliability: Part III—Positive Predictive Value, Error Rates, and Inter‐Rater Reliability*
12 references·2 citing·46 second hop
Forensic Footwear Reliability: Part III—Positive Predictive Value, Error Rates, and Inter‐Rater Reliability* (2020)Forensic Footwear Reliability: Part III—P…Forensic Footwear Reliability: Part II—Range of Conclusions, Accuracy, and Consensus* (2020)Forensic Footwear Reliability…Perceived strength of forensic scientists’ reporting statements about source conclusions (2018)Perceived strength of forensi…How Should Forensic Scientists Present Source Conclusions (2018)How Should Forensic Scientist…Understanding forensic expert evaluative evidence: A study of the perception of verbal expressions of the strength of evidence (2017)Understanding forensic expert…Lay understanding of forensic statistics: Evaluation of random match probabilities, likelihood ratios, and verbal equivalents. (2015)Lay understanding of forensic…Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters (2014)Handbook of Inter-Rater Relia…If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony (2011)If the Shoe Fits They Might A…Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions (2011)Accuracy and reliability of f…The testimony of forensic identification science: What expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear. (2009)The testimony of forensic ide…A Survey on the Conclusions Drawn on the Same Footwear Marks Obtained in Actual Cases by Several Experts Throughout the World (1999)A Survey on the Conclusions D…Survey of the conclusions drawn of similar footwear cases in various crime laboratories (1996)Survey of the conclusions dra…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…Shining a Light on Forensic Black-Box Studies (2023)Shining a Light on Forensic B…Repeatability and reproducibility of comparison decisions by firearms examiners (2023)Repeatability and reproducibi…Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Judgment under Uncertainty (1982)How Jurors Evaluate Fingerprint Evidence: The Relative Importance of Match Language, Method Information, and Error Acknowledgment (2013)The psychology of interpreting expert evaluative opinions (2013)The impact of proficiency testing information and error aversions on the weight given to fingerprint evidence (2019)Footwear impression evidence (1991)Crime Laboratory Proficiency Testing Results, 1978–1991, II: Resolving Questions of Common Origin (1995)Footwear Impression Evidence (2017)Forensic Footwear Reliability: Part I—Participant Demographics and Examiner Agreement* (2020)What made us ever think we could individualize using statistics? (1991)Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward (2009)Repeatability and Reproducibility of Decisions by Latent Fingerprint Examiners (2012)The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. (2013)Trusting Judgements: How to Get the Best out of Experts (2015)Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? (1999)Communicating Statistical Information (2000)Do confessions taint perceptions of handwriting evidence? An empirical test of the forensic confirmation bias. (2013)On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect (2014)(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science (2020)Evidential impact of base rates (1982)When are people persuaded by DNA match statistics? (2001)Communicating forensic science opinion: An examination of expert reporting practices (2019)Juror comprehension of forensic expert testimony: A literature review and gap analysis (2019)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS (1952)Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: I. The Method of Paired Comparisons (1952)A multi-group analysis of online survey respondent data quality: Comparing a regular USA consumer panel to MTurk samples (2016)Error Rates, Likelihood Ratios, and Jury Evaluation of Forensic Evidence (2020)Interpol review of fingermarks and other body impressions 2016–2019 (2020)The scientific reinvention of forensic science (2023)A Bayesian approach for interpreting shoemark evidence in forensic casework: Accounting for wear features (2011)Accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of forensic footwear examiner decisions (2022)The most consistent finding in forensic science is inconsistency (2023)How Cross‐Examination on Subjectivity and Bias Affects Jurors’ Evaluations of Forensic Science Evidence (2019)The Utility of Expanded Conclusion Scales During Latent Print Examinations (2020)Probabilistic reporting and algorithms in forensic science: Stakeholder perspectives within the American criminal justice system (2022)A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples (2013)Critical success factors for implementing lean production: the effect of contingencies (2015)Issues and Best Practices in Content Analysis (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 2014Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters1,097 cited
  • 2011Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions349 cited
  • 2009The testimony of forensic identification science: What expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear.102 cited
  • 2015Lay understanding of forensic statistics: Evaluation of random match probabilities, likelihood ratios, and verbal equivalents.75 cited
  • 2018Perceived strength of forensic scientists’ reporting statements about source conclusions39 cited
  • 2011If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony39 cited
  • 1996Survey of the conclusions drawn of similar footwear cases in various crime laboratories32 cited
  • 2018How Should Forensic Scientists Present Source Conclusions23 cited
  • 1999A Survey on the Conclusions Drawn on the Same Footwear Marks Obtained in Actual Cases by Several Experts Throughout the World18 cited
  • 2020Forensic Footwear Reliability: Part II—Range of Conclusions, Accuracy, and Consensus*18 cited
  • 2017Understanding forensic expert evaluative evidence: A study of the perception of verbal expressions of the strength of evidence17 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Repeatability and reproducibility of comparison decisions by firearms examiners

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

16 cited
  • 2023Shining a Light on Forensic Black-Box Studies12 cited