SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Transparency, trust, and integrated assessment models: An ethical consideration for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
16 references·4 citing·53 second hop
Transparency, trust, and integrated assessment models: An ethical consideration for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2020)Transparency, trust, and integrated asses…Five ways to ensure that models serve society: a manifesto (2020)Five ways to ensure that mode…Debating the bedrock of climate-change mitigation scenarios (2019)Debating the bedrock of clima…The politics of anticipation: the IPCC and the negative emissions technologies experience (2018)The politics of anticipation:…From Integrated to Integrative: Delivering on the Paris Agreement (2018)From Integrated to Integrativ…Narrowing the Climate Field: The Symbolic Power of Authors in the IPCC's Assessment of Mitigation (2017)Narrowing the Climate Field: …Energy scientists must show their workings (2017)Energy scientists must show t…The epistemic, ethical, and political dimensions of uncertainty in integrated assessment modeling (2016)The epistemic, ethical, and p…1.5 °C and climate research after the Paris Agreement (2016)1.5 °C and climate research a…Policy: Climate advisers must maintain integrity (2015)Policy: Climate advisers must…Patterns of authorship in the IPCC Working Group III report (2015)Patterns of authorship in the…When All Models Are Wrong (2014)When All Models Are WrongDocumentation for model transparency (2012)Documentation for model trans…Progress in integrated assessment and modelling1A Summary of a workshop on Integrated Assessment and Modelling, held at EcoSummit 2000: Integrating the Sciences, Halifax, June 18–22, 2000. See Costanza and Jorgensen (2001) for a further report on Ecosummit.1 (2002)Progress in integrated assess…A way out of the credibility crisis of models used in integrated environmental assessment (2002)A way out of the credibility …Integrated assessment modeling of global climate change: Transparent rational tool for policy making or opaque screen hiding value‐laden assumptions? (1997)Integrated assessment modelin…The institutional context of science, models, and policy: The IIASA energy study (1984)The institutional context of …Models and the common good (2025)Models and the common goodDigital Twins of the Earth Between Vision and Fiction (2025)Digital Twins of the Earth Be…Mitigation and Development Pathways in the Near to Mid-term (2023)Mitigation and Development Pa…Cost reductions in renewables can substantially erode the value of carbon capture and storage in mitigation pathways (2021)Cost reductions in renewables…Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers (1983)Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. (1983)Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences (1994)Climate change policy: quantifying uncertainties for damages and optimal carbon taxes (1999)Probabilistic Integrated Assessment of "Dangerous" Climate Change (2004)Exploring the possibility space: taking stock of the diverse capabilities and gaps in integrated assessment models (2021)Multidisciplinary research for natural resource management: Conceptual and practical implications (1996)Evaluation (not validation) of quantitative models. (1998)A review of the factors which influence the use and usefulness of information systems (2009)A methodology for the design and development of integrated models for policy support (2010)Review of literature on decision support systems for natural hazard risk reduction: Current status and future research directions (2017)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (1964)Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority (1996)Anticipating futures through models: the rise of Integrated Assessment Modelling in the climate science-policy interface since 1970 (2020)Techniques of futuring: On how imagined futures become socially performative (2021)Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists (1983)Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy (1990)Science for the post-normal age (1993)Uncertainty as a monster in the science–policy interface: four coping strategies (2005)Uncertainty communication in environmental assessments: views from the Dutch science-policy interface (2008)Administration by Algorithm? (2019)Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination (1992)Structural Holes (1992)Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1995)Beyond Technology: Demand-Side Solutions for Climate Change Mitigation (2016)Negative emissions and the long history of carbon removal (2020)Mapmakers and navigators, facts and values (2014)Towards a Reflexive Turn in the Governance of Global Environmental Expertise. The Cases of the IPCC and the IPBES (2014)Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions (2015)Sea ice decline and 21st century trans‐Arctic shipping routes (2016)The Paris Agreement: resolving the inconsistency between global goals and national contributions (2016)Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): Global potential, investment preferences, and deployment barriers (2018)The Logic of Practice (1990)Language and Symbolic Power. (1992)An Invitation of Reflexive Sociology (1993)Taking science by surprise: The knowledge politics of the IPCC Special Report on 1.5 degrees (2020)(In)justice in modelled climate futures: A review of integrated assessment modelling critiques through a justice lens (2022)Navigating the political: An analysis of political calibration of integrated assessment modelling in light of the 1.5 °C goal (2022)“Fixing” Climate Change by Mortgaging the Future: Negative Emissions, Spatiotemporal Fixes, and the Political Economy of Delay (2019)Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy in the Making: Assessing Developments in 9 OECD Cases (2021)Undoing Equivalence: Rethinking Carbon Accounting for Just Carbon Removal (2021)International Atomic Energy Agency (2022)Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life (1995)A Sociology of Quantification (2008)Statistical Inference as Severe Testing (2018)COVID-19: Large-scale collective action, government intervention, and the importance of trust (2020)Enabling assessment of distributive justice through models for climate change planning: A review of recent advances and a research agenda (2021)Sensitivity analysis of agent-based models: a new protocol (2022)How modelers construct energy costs: Discursive elements in Energy System and Integrated Assessment Models (2018)A Review of Criticisms of Integrated Assessment Models and Proposed Approaches to Address These, through the Lens of BECCS (2019)Reviewing two decades of energy system analysis with bibliometrics (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020Five ways to ensure that models serve society: a manifesto491 cited
  • 1997Integrated assessment modeling of global climate change: Transparent rational tool for policy making or opaque screen hiding value‐laden assumptions?311 cited
  • 20161.5 °C and climate research after the Paris Agreement308 cited
  • 2002Progress in integrated assessment and modelling1A Summary of a workshop on Integrated Assessment and Modelling, held at EcoSummit 2000: Integrating the Sciences, Halifax, June 18–22, 2000. See Costanza and Jorgensen (2001) for a further report on Ecosummit.1230 cited
  • 2015Patterns of authorship in the IPCC Working Group III report222 cited
  • 2018The politics of anticipation: the IPCC and the negative emissions technologies experience162 cited
  • 2002A way out of the credibility crisis of models used in integrated environmental assessment153 cited
  • 2017Energy scientists must show their workings128 cited
  • 1984The institutional context of science, models, and policy: The IIASA energy study118 cited
  • 2017Narrowing the Climate Field: The Symbolic Power of Authors in the IPCC's Assessment of Mitigation115 cited
  • 2019Debating the bedrock of climate-change mitigation scenarios112 cited
  • 2015Policy: Climate advisers must maintain integrity108 cited
  • 2014When All Models Are Wrong102 cited
  • 2012Documentation for model transparency

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

101 cited
  • 2016The epistemic, ethical, and political dimensions of uncertainty in integrated assessment modeling98 cited
  • 2018From Integrated to Integrative: Delivering on the Paris Agreement95 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Cost reductions in renewables can substantially erode the value of carbon capture and storage in mitigation pathways66 cited
    • 2023Mitigation and Development Pathways in the Near to Mid-term59 cited
    • 2025Models and the common good7 cited
    • 2025Digital Twins of the Earth Between Vision and Fiction7 cited