SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Making Narrative Statements to Describe Treatment Effects
8 references·0 citing·36 second hop
Making Narrative Statements to Describe Treatment Effects (2020)Making Narrative Statements to Describe T…Roadmap for Narratively Describing Effects of Interventions in Systematic Reviews (2020)Roadmap for Narratively Descr…GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions (2019)GRADE guidelines 26: informat…Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: what is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study (2018)Enhancing the uptake of syste…Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Pharmacotherapy for Childhood Anxiety Disorders (2017)Comparative Effectiveness and…Barriers and facilitators to uptake of systematic reviews by policy makers and health care managers: a scoping review (2015)Barriers and facilitators to …How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care (2014)How to Read a Systematic Revi…GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating u…Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses: the application of minimal important difference units (2010)Improving the interpretation …Measurement of health status (1989)Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures (2002)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes (2012)Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect (2019)Interpreting results and drawing conclusions (2019)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods (2014)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)New evidence pyramid (2016)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Using rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems and progress towards universal health coverage (2019)An Introduction to Scoping Reviews (2022)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (1988)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design : Choosing Among Five Approaches (2017)Implementation Science, Behavior Analysis, and Supporting Evidence-based Practices for Individuals with Autism (2019)PRISMA 2020 statement: What's new and the importance of reporting guidelines (2021)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions (2011)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)Scientific method: Statistical errors (2014)GRADE approach to drawing conclusions from a network meta-analysis using a minimally contextualised framework (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Autism and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: no epidemiological evidence for a causal association (1999)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials (2011)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence (2018)Pharmacotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder in adult and pediatric patients: an evidence-based treatment review (2018)Prevalence and Treatment of Depression, Anxiety, and Conduct Problems in US Children (2018)When continuous outcomes are measured using different scales: guide for meta-analysis and interpretation (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence1,335 cited
  • 2019GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions1,233 cited
  • 2014How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care465 cited
  • 2017Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Pharmacotherapy for Childhood Anxiety Disorders233 cited
  • 2015Barriers and facilitators to uptake of systematic reviews by policy makers and health care managers: a scoping review192 cited
  • 2010Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses: the application of minimal important difference units161 cited
  • 2018Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: what is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study61 cited
  • 2020Roadmap for Narratively Describing Effects of Interventions in Systematic Reviews11 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work